» Articles » PMID: 26985193

WBRT Vs. APBI: an Interim Report of Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 18
PMID 26985193
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine differences in patient's reported quality of life and self-reported breast cosmesis between whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) via single and multi-lumen high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for women with early stage breast cancer.

Material And Methods: Patient information was retrospectively reviewed and survey data were prospectively collected for women treated between 2004 to 2014 (APBI) and 2012 to 2014 (WBRT). Criteria for APBI treatments were ER+ (after 2010), N0 (after 2010), T < 3 cm, and post-menopausal. All patients were given a survey with modified FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) breast quality of life questions to rate their amount of pain, self-consciousness, low energy, presence of lymphedema, and breast cosmesis.

Results: 242 APBI patients and 59 WBRT patients were identified. In the WBRT cohort, 34 women met departmental criteria for APBI treatment (WBRT who were APBI eligible). The FACIT survey was completed by 80 women treated with APBI (33%; mean follow-up time of 14 months), and 26 women treated with WBRT who were APBI eligible (76%; mean follow-up time of 26 months). During the first year post-treatment, low energy (p = 0.009), self-consciousness (p = 0.0004), and lymphedema (p = 0.0002) scores were significantly lower in the APBI cohort when compared to women treated with WBRT who were APBI eligible. During the second year post-treatment, women treated with APBI reported significantly better breast cosmesis (p = 0.04). The single-lumen balloon (score = 6.3/10) was found to be associated with worse cosmesis compared to the multi-lumen balloons (Mammosite ML and Contura; score = 8.2/10; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence between balloons or treatments (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: APBI treated patients reported higher cosmetic satisfaction than patients in the matched WBRT cohort. Quality of life scores tended to improve over time. Multi-lumen catheters provided superior cosmetic results compared to single-lumen catheters.

Citing Articles

Quality of life in early breast cancer patients after adjuvant accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) in randomized trial.

Burkon P, Selingerova I, Vrzal M, Holanek M, Coufal O, Polachova K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1387.

PMID: 39779797 PMC: 11711455. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85342-2.


Patient-reported quality of life with interstitial partial breast brachytherapy and external beam whole breast radiotherapy: a comparison using propensity-score matching.

Wadasadawala T, Maitre P, Sinha S, Parmar V, Pathak R, Gaikar M J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021; 13(4):387-394.

PMID: 34484352 PMC: 8407260. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.107690.


Long-Term Results of Partial Breast Irradiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Trial in China.

Li Y, Shui L, Wang X, Sun Y, Zhong R, Shui P Front Oncol. 2020; 10:550950.

PMID: 32984062 PMC: 7492676. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.550950.


The prognosis comparison of different molecular subtypes of breast tumors after radiotherapy and the intrinsic reasons for their distinct radiosensitivity.

He L, Lv Y, Song Y, Zhang B Cancer Manag Res. 2019; 11:5765-5775.

PMID: 31303789 PMC: 6612049. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S213663.


Three-Fraction Intracavitary Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy: Early Provider and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Novel Regimen.

Jethwa K, Park S, Gonuguntla K, Wick S, Vallow L, Deufel C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 104(1):75-82.

PMID: 30583041 PMC: 6458060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.025.


References
1.
Wadasadawala T, Budrukkar A, Chopra S, Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Parmar V . Quality of life after accelerated partial breast irradiation in early breast cancer: matched pair analysis with protracted whole breast radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009; 21(9):668-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.07.014. View

2.
Antonucci J, Wallace M, Goldstein N, Kestin L, Chen P, Benitez P . Differences in patterns of failure in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation: a matched-pair analysis with 10-year follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 74(2):447-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.025. View

3.
Dickler A, Kirk M, Chu J, Nguyen C . The MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator: a review of technique and outcomes. Brachytherapy. 2005; 4(2):130-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2004.12.003. View

4.
Kini V . Balloon breast brachytherapy - review of current data. Brachytherapy. 2005; 4(3):181-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2005.07.003. View

5.
Tanaka E, Yamazaki H, Yoshida K, Takenaka T, Masuda N, Kotsuma T . Objective and longitudinal assessment of dermatitis after postoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in patients with breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: reduction of.... Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 81(4):1098-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.035. View