» Articles » PMID: 38247939

Differences in Trochlear Morphology of a New Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment from a Mechanical Alignment Design

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 22
PMID 38247939
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because kinematic alignment (KA) aligns femoral components in greater valgus and with less external rotation than mechanical alignment (MA), the trochlear groove of an MA design used in KA is medialized, which can lead to complications. Hence, a KA design has emerged. In this study, our primary objective was to quantify differences in trochlear morphology between the KA design and the MA design from which the KA design evolved. The KA and MA designs were aligned in KA on ten 3D femur-cartilage models. Dependent variables describing the morphology of the trochlea along the anterior flange, which extends proximal to the native trochlea, and along the arc length of the native trochlea, were determined, as was flange coverage. Along the anterior flange, the KA groove was significantly lateral proximally by 10 mm and was significantly wider proximally by 5 mm compared to the MA design ( < 0.0001). Along the arc length of the native trochlea, the KA groove was significantly lateral to the MA design by 4.3 mm proximally ( ≤ 0.0001) and was significantly wider proximally by 19 mm than the MA design. The KA design reduced lateral under-coverage of the flange from 4 mm to 2 mm ( < 0.0001). The KA design potentially mitigates risk of patellofemoral complications by lateralizing and widening the groove to avoid medializing the patella for wide variations in the lateral distal femoral angle, and by widening the flange laterally to reduce under-coverage. This information enables clinicians to make informed decisions regarding use of the KA design.

Citing Articles

The Orientation of the Prosthetic Trochlear Angle Is Predictable in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Cacciola G, Vezza D, Masse A, Sabatini L J Pers Med. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39997329 PMC: 11856362. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15020052.


Medial Deviation of a 6° Prosthetic Trochlear Groove After Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Occurs in Four Types of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) and Decreases the Forgotten Joint Score.

Jeremic D, Bellemans J, Sappey-Marinier E, Howell S, Hettwer W, Hull M Arthroplast Today. 2025; 30:101569.

PMID: 39759179 PMC: 11699096. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101569.


The Influence of Kinematic Alignment on Patellofemoral Joint Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Simon J, Bauer L, Thorwachter C, Woiczinski M, Simon F, Muller P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598038 PMC: 11594998. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226894.

References
1.
Brar A, Howell S, Hull M, Mahfouz M . Does Kinematic Alignment and Flexion of a Femoral Component Designed for Mechanical Alignment Reduce the Proximal and Lateral Reach of the Trochlea?. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(8):1808-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.040. View

2.
Leopold S, Silverton C, Barden R, Rosenberg A . Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1):41-7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00007. View

3.
Berger R, Crossett L, Jacobs J, Rubash H . Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (356):144-53. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021. View

4.
Gonzalez M, Mekhail A . The failed total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and etiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12(6):436-46. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200411000-00008. View

5.
Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Hull M . Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(10):2271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2621-x. View