» Articles » PMID: 26903896

Using Decision Models to Enhance Investigations of Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Feb 24
PMID 26903896
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is great interest in relating individual differences in cognitive processing to activation of neural systems. The general process involves relating measures of task performance like reaction times or accuracy to brain activity to identify individual differences in neural processing. One limitation of this approach is that measures like reaction times can be affected by multiple components of processing. For instance, some individuals might have higher accuracy in a memory task because they respond more cautiously, not because they have better memory. Computational models of decision making, like the drift-diffusion model and the linear ballistic accumulator model, provide a potential solution to this problem. They can be fitted to data from individual participants to disentangle the effects of the different processes driving behavior. In this sense the models can provide cleaner measures of the processes of interest, and enhance our understanding of how neural activity varies across individuals or populations. The advantages of this model-based approach to investigating individual differences in neural activity are discussed with recent examples of how this method can improve our understanding of the brain-behavior relationship.

Citing Articles

Information processing style and institutional trust as factors of COVID vaccine hesitancy.

Zhao W, Russell C, Jankovsky A, Cannon T, Pittenger C, Pushkarskaya H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10416.

PMID: 38710827 PMC: 11074285. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60788-y.


Assessing the Longitudinal Associations Between Decision-Making Processes and Attention Problems in Early Adolescence.

Wiker T, Pedersen M, Ferschmann L, Beck D, Norbom L, Dahl A Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023; 52(5):803-817.

PMID: 38103132 PMC: 11063004. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-023-01148-8.


Listening efficiency in adult cochlear-implant users compared with normally-hearing controls at ecologically relevant signal-to-noise ratios.

Perea Perez F, Hartley D, Kitterick P, Zekveld A, Naylor G, Wiggins I Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1214485.

PMID: 37520928 PMC: 10379644. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1214485.


Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias.

Zajkowski W, Bielecki M, Marszal-Wisniewska M PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0268501.

PMID: 35648760 PMC: 9159610. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268501.


Environment and body-brain interplay affect inhibition and decision-making.

Bouny P, Trousselard M, Jacob S, Vialatte F, Verdonk C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4303.

PMID: 35277591 PMC: 8917140. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08280-3.


References
1.
Ratcliff R, Thapar A, Gomez P, McKoon G . A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychol Aging. 2004; 19(2):278-89. PMC: 1360155. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278. View

2.
Wagenmakers E, van der Maas H, Grasman R . An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(1):3-22. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194023. View

3.
Ratcliff R, McKoon G . The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 2007; 20(4):873-922. PMC: 2474742. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420. View

4.
Brown S, Heathcote A . The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn Psychol. 2008; 57(3):153-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002. View

5.
Vandekerckhove J, Tuerlinckx F . Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: a DMAT primer. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(1):61-72. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.1.61. View