» Articles » PMID: 23370060

A Bayesian Framework for Simultaneously Modeling Neural and Behavioral Data

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Feb 2
PMID 23370060
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scientists who study cognition infer underlying processes either by observing behavior (e.g., response times, percentage correct) or by observing neural activity (e.g., the BOLD response). These two types of observations have traditionally supported two separate lines of study. The first is led by cognitive modelers, who rely on behavior alone to support their computational theories. The second is led by cognitive neuroimagers, who rely on statistical models to link patterns of neural activity to experimental manipulations, often without any attempt to make a direct connection to an explicit computational theory. Here we present a flexible Bayesian framework for combining neural and cognitive models. Joining neuroimaging and computational modeling in a single hierarchical framework allows the neural data to influence the parameters of the cognitive model and allows behavioral data, even in the absence of neural data, to constrain the neural model. Critically, our Bayesian approach can reveal interactions between behavioral and neural parameters, and hence between neural activity and cognitive mechanisms. We demonstrate the utility of our approach with applications to simulated fMRI data with a recognition model and to diffusion-weighted imaging data with a response time model of perceptual choice.

Citing Articles

Complementary benefits of multivariate and hierarchical models for identifying individual differences in cognitive control.

Freund M, Chen R, Chen G, Braver T Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025; 3.

PMID: 39957839 PMC: 11823007. DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00447.


FrAMBI: A Software Framework for Auditory Modeling Based on Bayesian Inference.

Barumerli R, Majdak P Neuroinformatics. 2025; 23(2):20.

PMID: 39928214 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-024-09702-5.


Interpretation of individual differences in computational neuroscience using a latent input approach.

Schaaf J, Miletic S, van Duijvenvoorde A, Huizenga H Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101512.

PMID: 39854872 PMC: 11804603. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101512.


The representational instability in the generalization of fear learning.

Yu K, Vanpaemel W, Tuerlinckx F, Zaman J NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):78.

PMID: 39702746 PMC: 11659557. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00287-x.


Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models.

Rmus M, Pan T, Xia L, Collins A PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(5):e1012119.

PMID: 38748770 PMC: 11132492. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012119.


References
1.
Kershaw J, Ardekani B, Kanno I . Application of Bayesian inference to fMRI data analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 18(12):1138-53. DOI: 10.1109/42.819324. View

2.
Forstmann B, Anwander A, Schafer A, Neumann J, Brown S, Wagenmakers E . Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(36):15916-20. PMC: 2936628. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004932107. View

3.
ODoherty J, Hampton A, Kim H . Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007; 1104:35-53. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1390.022. View

4.
Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich M, Smith S, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Boulby P . Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(7):750-7. DOI: 10.1038/nn1075. View

5.
Gershman S, Blei D, Pereira F, Norman K . A topographic latent source model for fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2011; 57(1):89-100. PMC: 3101582. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.042. View