» Articles » PMID: 26844147

Food and Beverage Promotions in Vancouver Schools: A Study of the Prevalence and Characteristics of In-school Advertising, Messaging, and Signage

Overview
Journal Prev Med Rep
Date 2016 Feb 5
PMID 26844147
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide a descriptive profile of food-related advertising, messaging, and signage in Vancouver schools and to examine differences in the prevalence and characteristics of promotions between elementary and secondary schools. All food-related promotions were photographed in 23 diverse Vancouver public schools between November 2012 and April 2013. Key attributes, including the location, size, and main purpose of each promotion, as well as the type of food and/or beverage advertised and compliance with provincial school nutrition guidelines, were coded. Descriptive statistics assessed the prevalence and characteristics of promotions. Cross-tabulations examined whether the promotional landscape differed between elementary and secondary schools. All secondary and 80% of elementary schools contained food or beverage promotions (median = 17, range = 0-57 promotions per school). Of the 493 promotions documented, approximately 25% depicted "choose least" or "not recommended" items, prohibited for sale by provincial school nutrition guidelines. Nearly 1/3 of promotions advertised commercial items (e.g., brand name beverages such as Pepsi), in violation of the Board of Education's advertising policies and only 13% conveyed nutrition education messages. Close to half of all promotions were created by students for class projects, many of which marketed minimally nutritious items. In Vancouver schools, food-related promotions are common and are more prevalent in secondary than elementary schools. Students are regularly exposed to messaging for nutritionally poor items that are not in compliance with provincial school nutrition guidelines and which violate school board advertising policies. Stronger oversight of food-related promotional materials is needed to ensure that schools provide health promoting food environments.

Citing Articles

Food environment research in Canada: a rapid review of methodologies and measures deployed between 2010 and 2021.

Vaillancourt C, Ahmed M, Kirk S, Labonte M, Laar A, Mah C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):18.

PMID: 38373957 PMC: 10875887. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01558-x.


What Do Polish Parents and Caregivers Think ofDietary Supplements for Children Aged 3-12?.

Piekara A, Krzywonos M, Kaczmarczyk M Nutrients. 2020; 12(10).

PMID: 33050235 PMC: 7600402. DOI: 10.3390/nu12103076.


Food and beverage marketing in primary and secondary schools in Canada.

Potvin Kent M, Velazquez C, Pauze E, Cheng-Boivin O, Berfeld N BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):114.

PMID: 30691422 PMC: 6348619. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6441-x.


Food marketing in recreational sport settings in Canada: a cross-sectional audit in different policy environments using the Food and beverage Marketing Assessment Tool for Settings (FoodMATS).

Prowse R, Naylor P, Olstad D, Carson V, Storey K, Masse L Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):39.

PMID: 29848329 PMC: 5977555. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0673-5.


Reliability and validity of a novel tool to comprehensively assess food and beverage marketing in recreational sport settings.

Prowse R, Naylor P, Olstad D, Carson V, Masse L, Storey K Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):38.

PMID: 29848321 PMC: 5977740. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0667-3.


References
1.
Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zeitler P . The global spread of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2005; 146(5):693-700. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.12.042. View

2.
Kelly B, Hattersley L, King L, Flood V . Persuasive food marketing to children: use of cartoons and competitions in Australian commercial television advertisements. Health Promot Int. 2008; 23(4):337-44. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dan023. View

3.
Alvy L, Calvert S . Food marketing on popular children's web sites: a content analysis. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008; 108(4):710-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.01.006. View

4.
Masse L, de Niet-Fitzgerald J, Watts A, Naylor P, Saewyc E . Associations between the school food environment, student consumption and body mass index of Canadian adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11(1):29. PMC: 3987130. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-29. View

5.
Harris J, Brownell K, Bargh J . The Food Marketing Defense Model: Integrating Psychological Research to Protect Youth and Inform Public Policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010; 3(1):211-271. PMC: 2826802. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01015.x. View