» Articles » PMID: 28895921

Food and Beverage Marketing in Schools: A Review of the Evidence

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2017 Sep 13
PMID 28895921
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite growing interest from government agencies, non-governmental organizations and school boards in restricting or regulating unhealthy food and beverage marketing to children, limited research has examined the emerging knowledge base regarding school-based food and beverage marketing in high-income countries. This review examined current approaches for measuring school food and beverage marketing practices, and evidence regarding the extent of exposure and hypothesized associations with children's diet-related outcomes. Five databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO) and six grey literature sources were searched for papers that explicitly examined school-based food and beverage marketing policies or practices. Twenty-seven papers, across four high-income countries including Canada ( = 2), Ireland ( = 1), Poland ( = 1) and United States ( = 23) were identified and reviewed. Results showed that three main methodological approaches have been used: direct observation, self-report surveys, and in-person/telephone interviews, but few studies reported on the validity or reliability of measures. Findings suggest that students in the U.S. are commonly exposed to a broad array of food and beverage marketing approaches including direct and indirect advertising, although the extent of exposure varies widely across studies. More pervasive marketing exposure was found among secondary or high schools compared with elementary/middle schools and among schools with lower compared with higher socio-economic status. Three of five studies examining diet-related outcomes found that exposure to school-based food and beverage marketing was associated with food purchasing or consumption, particularly for minimally nutritious items. There remains a need for a core set of standard and universal measures that are sufficiently rigorous and comprehensive to assess the totality of school food and beverage marketing practices that can be used to compare exposure between study contexts and over time. Future research should examine the validity of school food and beverage marketing assessments and the impacts of exposure (and emerging policies that reduce exposure) on children's purchasing and diet-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviors in school settings.

Citing Articles

National Policies to Limit Nutrients, Ingredients, or Categories of Concern in School Meals: A Global Scoping Review.

Busey E, Chamberlin G, Mardin K, Perry M, Smith Taillie L, Dillman Carpentier F Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(10):104456.

PMID: 39429507 PMC: 11490762. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104456.


Comparison of ten policy options to equitably reduce children's exposure to unhealthy food marketing.

Gage R, Liu W, Pearson A, Smith M, Barr M, Shortridge A Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e130.

PMID: 38680070 PMC: 11112427. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024000958.


Healthy, Inclusive and Sustainable Catering in Secondary Schools-An Analysis of a Transformation Process with Multiple Tensions.

Hennchen B, Schafer M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(3).

PMID: 38541369 PMC: 10969783. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21030370.


School-Based Nutrition Programs in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review.

Al-Jawaldeh A, Matbouli D, Diab S, Taktouk M, Hojeij L, Naalbandian S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(22).

PMID: 37998278 PMC: 10671197. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20227047.


The conceptualisation and operationalisation of 'marketing' in public health research: a review of reviews focused on food marketing using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.

Forde H, Chavez-Ugalde Y, Jones R, Garrott K, Kotta P, Greaves F BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1419.

PMID: 37488556 PMC: 10367353. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16293-4.


References
1.
Johnston L, Delva J, OMalley P . Soft drink availability, contracts, and revenues in American secondary schools. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(4 Suppl):S209-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.006. View

2.
Lamichhane A, Mayer-Davis E, Puett R, Bottai M, Porter D, Liese A . Associations of built food environment with dietary intake among youth with diabetes. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44(3):217-24. PMC: 7787521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.003. View

3.
Probart C, McDonnell E, Bailey-Davis L, Weirich J . Existence and predictors of soft drink advertisements in Pennsylvania high schools. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(12):2052-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.09.013. View

4.
McDonnell E, Probart C, Weirich J, Hartman T, Bailey-Davis L . School competitive food policies: perceptions of Pennsylvania public high school foodservice directors and principals. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(2):271-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.034. View

5.
Engler-Stringer R, Le H, Gerrard A, Muhajarine N . The community and consumer food environment and children's diet: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:522. PMC: 4048041. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-522. View