» Articles » PMID: 23772988

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Decompression of Malignant Bowel Obstruction

Overview
Journal Dig Endosc
Date 2013 Jun 19
PMID 23772988
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous reports on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for bowel decompression have included a relatively small number of patients and the details of post-procedural outcomes and complications are lacking. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes and safety of PEG for bowel decompression in a relatively large number of patients with malignant bowel obstruction.

Patients And Methods: Over a 10-year period, 76 patients with malignant bowel obstruction were referred to the main referral cancer center in Shizuoka prefecture for PEG to obtain decompression. The method for gastrostomy was carried out by the pull-method, the modified introducer method and the percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy method. Patient demographics, procedural success, complications, elimination of nasal intubation, and survival were reviewed.

Results: Successful placement was achieved in 93% of patients (71/76). Procedure-related complications occurred in 21% ofpatients (15/71), of which the majority involved stomal leakage (eight patients), and wound infection (six patients). There were no procedure-related deaths. Among the 55 patients who required nasal intubation before PEG, a trans-gastrostomy intestinal tube was inserted in 16 patients. The need for further nasal intubation was eliminated in 96% of the patients (53/55). The median survival time was 63 days (range, 8-444 days) after PEG placement.

Conclusions: PEG for bowel decompression in patients with malignant obstruction can be carried out with an acceptable risk of minor complications. In combination with a trans-gastrostomy intestinal tube insertion, the elimination of nasal intubation can be achieved in most patients.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Palliative Decompressive Gastrostomy Tube Placement on Patients and Their Caregivers: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Roberson J, Gasior J, Ginzberg S, Bakillah E, Passman J, Shreve L Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6931-6938.

PMID: 39085545 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15943-0.


Time trends and outcomes of gastrostomy placement in a Swedish national cohort over two decades.

Skogar M, Sundbom M World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(10):1358-1367.

PMID: 38596497 PMC: 11000080. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1358.


Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: palliative interventions outcomes - mixed-methods systematic review.

Patterson M, Greenley S, Ma Y, Bullock A, Curry J, Smithson J BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024; 13(e3):e515-e527.

PMID: 38557409 PMC: 10850628. DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003492.


Percutaneous Image-Guided Transesophageal Long Intestinal Tube Placement for Palliative Decompression in Advanced Cancer Patients with Unresectable Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction.

Itou C, Arai Y, Sone M, Sugawara S, Kimura S, Onishi Y Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023; 46(8):1000-1012.

PMID: 37188898 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03457-3.


The range and suitability of outcome measures used in the assessment of palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: A systematic review.

Bravington A, Obita G, Baddeley E, Johnson M, Murtagh F, Currow D Palliat Med. 2022; 36(9):1336-1350.

PMID: 36131489 PMC: 10150264. DOI: 10.1177/02692163221122352.