» Articles » PMID: 26692524

Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities

Overview
Journal Transl Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Dec 23
PMID 26692524
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mammographic density has been proven as an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Women with dense breast tissue visible on a mammogram have a much higher cancer risk than women with little density. A great research effort has been devoted to incorporate breast density into risk prediction models to better estimate each individual's cancer risk. In recent years, the passage of breast density notification legislation in many states in USA requires that every mammography report should provide information regarding the patient's breast density. Accurate definition and measurement of breast density are thus important, which may allow all the potential clinical applications of breast density to be implemented. Because the two-dimensional mammography-based measurement is subject to tissue overlapping and thus not able to provide volumetric information, there is an urgent need to develop reliable quantitative measurements of breast density. Various new imaging technologies are being developed. Among these new modalities, volumetric mammographic density methods and three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging are the most well studied. Besides, emerging modalities, including different x-ray-based, optical imaging, and ultrasound-based methods, have also been investigated. All these modalities may either overcome some fundamental problems related to mammographic density or provide additional density and/or compositional information. The present review article aimed to summarize the current established and emerging imaging techniques for the measurement of breast density and the evidence of the clinical use of these density methods from the literature.

Citing Articles

Concurrent water T and fat fraction mapping of the breast using the radial gradient and spin echo (RADGRASE) pulse sequence.

Hagio T, Galons J, Roe D, Marron M, Thomson C, Thompson P Magn Reson Imaging. 2025; 118:110355.

PMID: 39921152 PMC: 11890947. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110355.


Variability in Breast Density Estimation and Its Impact on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.

Ji H, Jang M, Chang J J Breast Cancer. 2024; 27(5):334-342.

PMID: 39344408 PMC: 11543276. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2024.0101.


Comparison of Visual and Quantra Software Mammographic Density Assessment According to BI-RADS in 2D and 3D Images.

Morciano F, Marcazzan C, Rella R, Tommasini O, Conti M, Belli P J Imaging. 2024; 10(9).

PMID: 39330458 PMC: 11433353. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10090238.


Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis.

Heine J, Fowler E, Weinfurtner R, Hume E, Tworoger S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18760.

PMID: 37907569 PMC: 10618274. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x.


Changes in Automated Mammographic Breast Density Can Predict Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Ahn J, Go J, Lee S, Kim J, Park H, Kim S Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(5):384-394.

PMID: 37133209 PMC: 10157320. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0629.


References
1.
Glide-Hurst C, Duric N, Littrup P . A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density. Med Phys. 2007; 34(11):4491-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.2789407. View

2.
Gubern-Merida A, Kallenberg M, Platel B, Mann R, Marti R, Karssemeijer N . Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e85952. PMC: 3897574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085952. View

3.
Khazen M, Warren R, Boggis C, Bryant E, Reed S, Warsi I . A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17(9):2268-74. PMC: 2582975. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2547. View

4.
Moon W, Shen Y, Huang C, Luo S, Kuzucan A, Chen J . Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI. Med Phys. 2011; 38(1):382-9. PMC: 3021561. DOI: 10.1118/1.3523617. View

5.
Colin C, Prince V, Valette P . Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 82(3):404-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001. View