» Articles » PMID: 18804333

Automatic Segmentation of Whole Breast Using Atlas Approach and Deformable Image Registration

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2008 Sep 23
PMID 18804333
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare interobserver variations in delineating the whole breast for treatment planning using two contouring methods.

Methods And Materials: Autosegmented contours were generated by a deformable image registration-based breast segmentation method (DEF-SEG) by mapping the whole breast clinical target volume (CTVwb) from a template case to a new patient case. Eight breast radiation oncologists modified the autosegmented contours as necessary to achieve a clinically appropriate CTVwb and then recontoured the same case from scratch for comparison. The times to complete each approach, as well as the interobserver variations, were analyzed. The template case was also mapped to 10 breast cancer patients with a body mass index of 19.1-35.9 kg/m(2). The three-dimensional surface-to-surface distances and volume overlapping analyses were computed to quantify contour variations.

Results: The median time to edit the DEF-SEG-generated CTVwb was 12.9 min (range, 3.4-35.9) compared with 18.6 min (range, 8.9-45.2) to contour the CTVwb from scratch (30% faster, p = 0.028). The mean surface-to-surface distance was noticeably reduced from 1.6 mm among the contours generated from scratch to 1.0 mm using the DEF-SEG method (p = 0.047). The deformed contours in 10 patients achieved 94% volume overlap before correction and required editing of 5% (range, 1-10%) of the contoured volume.

Conclusion: Significant interobserver variations suggested a lack of consensus regarding the CTVwb, even among breast cancer specialists. Using the DEF-SEG method produced more consistent results and required less time. The DEF-SEG method can be successfully applied to patients with different body mass indexes.

Citing Articles

A Vessel Bifurcation Landmark Pair Dataset for Abdominal CT Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Validation.

Criscuolo E, Hao Y, Zhang Z, McKeown T, Yang D ArXiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39876932 PMC: 11774459.


A survey on deep learning in medical image registration: New technologies, uncertainty, evaluation metrics, and beyond.

Chen J, Liu Y, Wei S, Bian Z, Subramanian S, Carass A Med Image Anal. 2024; 100():103385.

PMID: 39612808 PMC: 11730935. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103385.


Potential of E-Learning Interventions and Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Contouring Skills in Radiotherapy: The ELAISA Study.

Rasmussen M, Akbarov K, Titovich E, Nijkamp J, van Elmpt W, Primdahl H JCO Glob Oncol. 2024; 10:e2400173.

PMID: 39236283 PMC: 11404336. DOI: 10.1200/GO.24.00173.


An overview of artificial intelligence in medical physics and radiation oncology.

Liu J, Xiao H, Fan J, Hu W, Yang Y, Dong P J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 3(3):211-221.

PMID: 39035195 PMC: 11256546. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.08.002.


A clinical evaluation of the performance of five commercial artificial intelligence contouring systems for radiotherapy.

Doolan P, Charalambous S, Roussakis Y, Leczynski A, Peratikou M, Benjamin M Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1213068.

PMID: 37601695 PMC: 10436522. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1213068.


References
1.
Chang S, Deschesne K, Cullip T, PARKER S, Earnhart J . A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 45(5):1305-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00344-2. View

2.
Hurkmans C, Borger J, Pieters B, Russell N, Jansen E, Mijnheer B . Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 50(5):1366-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01635-2. View

3.
Toro R, Burnod Y . Geometric atlas: modeling the cortex as an organized surface. Neuroimage. 2003; 20(3):1468-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.008. View

4.
Zou K, Warfield S, Bharatha A, Tempany C, Kaus M, Haker S . Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. Acad Radiol. 2004; 11(2):178-89. PMC: 1415224. DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00671-8. View

5.
Wang H, Dong L, ODaniel J, Mohan R, Garden A, Ang K . Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(12):2887-905. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011. View