» Articles » PMID: 20175484

Quantitative Analysis of Breast Parenchymal Patterns Using 3D Fibroglandular Tissues Segmented Based on MRI

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2010 Feb 24
PMID 20175484
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Mammographic density and breast parenchymal patterns (the relative distribution of fatty and fibroglandular tissue) have been shown to be associated with the risk of developing breast cancer. Percent breast density as determined by mammography is a well-established risk factor, but on the other hand, studies on parenchymal pattern have been scarce, possibly due to the lack of reliable quantitative parameters that can be used to analyze parenchymal tissue distribution. In this study the morphology of fibroglandular tissue distribution was analyzed using three-dimensional breast MRI, which is not subject to the tissue overlapping problem.

Methods: Four parameters, circularity, convexity, irregularity, and compactness, which are sensitive to the shape and margin of segmented fibroglandular tissue, were analyzed for 230 patients. Cases were assigned to one of two distinct parenchymal breast patterns: Intermingled pattern with intermixed fatty and fibroglandular tissue (Type I, N = 141), and central pattern with confined fibroglandular tissue inside surrounded by fatty tissue outside (Type C, N = 89). For each analyzed parameter, the differentiation between these two patterns was analyzed using a two-tailed t-test based on transformed parameters to normal distribution, as well as distribution histograms and ROC analysis.

Results: These two groups of patients were well matched both in age (50 +/- 11 vs 50 +/- 11) and in fibroglandular tissue volume (Type I: 104 +/- 62 cm3 vs Type C: 112 +/- 73 cm3). Between Type I and Type C breasts, all four morphological parameters showed significant differences that could be used to differentiate between the two breast types. In the ROC analysis, among all four parameters, the "compactness" could achieve the highest area under the curve of 0.84, and when all four parameters were combined, the AUC could be further increased to 0.94.

Conclusions: The results suggest that these morphological parameters analyzed from 3D MRI can be used to distinguish between intermingled and central dense tissue distribution patterns, and hence may be used to characterize breast parenchymal pattern quantitatively. The availability of these quantitative morphological parameters may facilitate the investigation of the relationship between parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk.

Citing Articles

Multimodality Imaging of Breast Parenchymal Density and Correlation with Risk Assessment.

Wengert G, Helbich T, Leithner D, Morris E, Baltzer P, Pinker K Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2022; 11(1):23-33.

PMID: 35496471 PMC: 9044508. DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-0302-6.


Quantitative Measurement of Breast Density Using Personalized 3D-Printed Breast Model for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Sindi R, Wong Y, Yeong C, Sun Z Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(10).

PMID: 33036272 PMC: 7599838. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10100793.


Quantitative Measures of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Predict Breast Cancer Risk.

Niell B, Abdalah M, Stringfield O, Raghunand N, Ataya D, Gillies R AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 217(1):64-75.

PMID: 32876474 PMC: 9801515. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23804.


Quantitative Measurements of Breast Density Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sindi R, Sa Dos Reis C, Bennett C, Stevenson G, Sun Z J Clin Med. 2019; 8(5).

PMID: 31137728 PMC: 6571752. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8050745.


Small-window parametric imaging based on information entropy for ultrasound tissue characterization.

Tsui P, Chen C, Kuo W, Chang K, Fang J, Ma H Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41004.

PMID: 28106118 PMC: 5247684. DOI: 10.1038/srep41004.


References
1.
Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti D, Buist D, Vacek P, Smith-Bindman R . Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(5):386-95. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djk066. View

2.
Wolfe J, Saftlas A, Salane M . Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 148(6):1087-92. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.6.1087. View

3.
Graham S, Bronskill M, Byng J, Yaffe M, Boyd N . Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73(2):162-8. PMC: 2074314. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.30. View

4.
Russo J, Lynch H, Russo I . Mammary gland architecture as a determining factor in the susceptibility of the human breast to cancer. Breast J. 2002; 7(5):278-91. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.21033.x. View

5.
Wei J, Chan H, Helvie M, Roubidoux M, Sahiner B, Hadjiiski L . Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. Med Phys. 2004; 31(4):933-42. DOI: 10.1118/1.1668512. View