» Articles » PMID: 26682160

Comparation of Effectiveness of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens and Hydrogel Contact Lens in Patients After LASEK

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Dec 19
PMID 26682160
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To conduct a comparative study of effectiveness of silicone hydrogel contact lens and hydrogel contact lens, which are used in patients after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).

Methods: Sixty-three patients (121 eyes) with a spherical equivalent ≤-5.0 D were chosen after undergoing LASEK in 2012 at Guangdong General Hospital. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. The silicone hydrogel group included 32 cases (61 eyes) that wore silicone hydrogel contact lenses for 4-6d after the operation, while the hydrogel group included 31 cases (60 eyes) who wore hydrogel contact lenses for 4-6d after the operation. Patients' self-reported postoperative symptoms (including pain, photophobia, tears, and foreign body sensation) were evaluated. The healing time of the corneal epithelium, the visual acuity of patients without contact lens after epithelial healing, and the incidence of delayed corneal epithelial shedding were also assessed. The follow-up time was 1mo.

Results: Postoperative symptoms were milder in the silicone hydrogel group than in the hydrogel group. There were significant differences in pain, foreign body sensation, and photophobia between the 2 groups (P<0.05), although there was no significant difference in postoperative tearing (P>0.05). The healing time of the corneal epithelium in the silicone hydrogel lens group was markedly shorter than that in the hydrogel group (4.07±0.25 vs 4.33±0.82d, t=2.43, P=0.02). Visual acuity without contact lenses after healing of the corneal epithelium was better in the silicone hydrogel group compared with the hydrogel group (χ (2)=7.76, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of delayed corneal epithelial shedding between the 2 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with LASEK using silicon hydrogel contact lenses had less discomfort and shorter corneal epithelial healing time compared with those using hydrogel contact lenses, suggesting that silicon hydrogel contact lenses may be considered to be a better choice of bandage contact lens after LASEK.

Citing Articles

Performance of Bandage Contact Lens in Patients Post-ocular Surgeries: A Systematic Literature Review.

Zheng Y, Zhai C Eye Contact Lens. 2023; 49(11):449-458.

PMID: 37816246 PMC: 10734785. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001021.


Comparison of efficacy of two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses after T-PRK.

Li H, Shao T, Zhang J, Leng L, Liu S, Long K Int J Ophthalmol. 2022; 15(2):299-305.

PMID: 35186691 PMC: 8818449. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.02.16.


Clinical Observation of Silicon Hydrogel Contact Lens Fitted Immediately after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Wang J, Xi S, Wang B, Chen Z, Zheng K, Zhou X J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020:2604917.

PMID: 32922966 PMC: 7453240. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2604917.


The protective efficacy and safety of bandage contact lenses in children aged 5 to 11 after frontalis muscle flap suspension for congenital blepharoptosis: A single-center randomized controlled trial.

Chen L, Pi L, Ke N, Chen X, Liu Q Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(36):e8003.

PMID: 28885362 PMC: 6392512. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008003.

References
1.
Compan V, Andrio A, Lopez-Alemany A, Riande E, Refojo M . Oxygen permeability of hydrogel contact lenses with organosilicon moieties. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(13):2767-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00012-1. View

2.
Yuksel N, Bilgihan K, Hondur A, Yildiz B, Yuksel E . Long term results of Epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013; 37(3):132-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2013.09.005. View

3.
Lim L, Tan D, Chan W . Therapeutic use of Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lenses. CLAO J. 2001; 27(4):179-85. View

4.
Holden B, Mertz G . Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily and extended wear contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984; 25(10):1161-7. View

5.
Korkmaz S, Bilgihan K, Sul S, Hondur A . A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia. J Ophthalmol. 2014; 2014:784185. PMC: 4121279. DOI: 10.1155/2014/784185. View