» Articles » PMID: 24128385

Long Term Results of Epi-LASIK and LASEK for Myopia

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2013 Oct 17
PMID 24128385
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long term clinical and confocal results of mechanical (Epi-LASIK) versus alcohol-assisted laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for correction of myopia.

Setting: Gazi University Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: Twenty-two eyes treated with LASEK and twenty eyes treated with Epi-LASIK were evaluated with a mean follow-up duration of 45 months. Mechanical separation of the epithelium was performed with Lasitome epithelial separator, and alcohol-assisted separation with 25s application of 18% alcohol. Laser ablation was performed with the ESIRIS laser. All patients were examined daily until epithelial closure; at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and every year subsequently. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, haze, and gray scale value in confocal microscopy, efficacy and safety indexes.

Results: Preoperative myopic spherical equivalent refraction was -4.65 ± 1.74 D in the LASEK and -3.87 ± 1.30 D in the Epi-LASIK-treated eyes (p=0.36). Of both LASEK and Epi-LASIK-treated eyes, 95% achieved 20/25 or better final UCVA. The grade of haze and mean gray scale value in confocal microscopy were similar in LASEK and Epi-LASIK-treated eyes at all postoperative periods. The efficacy index was 0.94 in LASEK group and 0.96 in Epi-LASIK group (p=0.44). The safety index was 1.01 in LASEK group and 1.02 in Epi-LASIK group (p=0.42).

Conclusions: Both LASEK and Epi-LASIK offer safe and effective correction of myopia in the long term.

Citing Articles

Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study.

Yu M, Chen M, Liu W, Dai J BMC Ophthalmol. 2019; 19(1):80.

PMID: 30894159 PMC: 6425702. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1084-3.


Predictability and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy with mitomycin C for the correction of high myopia.

Iu L, Fan M, Chen I, Lai J Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(22):e7076.

PMID: 28562575 PMC: 5459740. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007076.


Comparation of effectiveness of silicone hydrogel contact lens and hydrogel contact lens in patients after LASEK.

Xie W, Zeng J, Cui Y, Li J, Li Z, Liao W Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(6):1131-5.

PMID: 26682160 PMC: 4651876. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.09.


Influence of transient intraocular pressure elevation during laser in situ keratomileusis on rabbit retina thickness.

Zhao H, Liu H, Niu C, Guan W Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(6):1089-93.

PMID: 26682153 PMC: 4651869. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.02.


Long term results of no-alcohol laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Spadea L, Verboschi F, De Rosa V, Salomone M, Vingolo E Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(3):574-9.

PMID: 26086011 PMC: 4458666. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.03.25.