Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Novel Ti/PEEK Combined Spinal Fusion Cages: a Systematic Review and Preclinical Evaluation

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2015 Dec 17

PMID 26671514

Citations 23

Authors

Yusuf Assem

Ralph J Mobbs

Matthew H Pelletier

Kevin Phan

William R Walsh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The primary objective of this paper was to provide a systematic review of the available clinical studies of Ti/PEEK combined cages in spinal interbody fusion surgeries, focusing on their radiological and clinical outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide a review and evaluation of the in vitro and preclinical studies reported on Ti/PEEK-coated implants.

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in March 2015 via three databases: Medline, Embase and Cochrane library. The following key search terms were combined with synonyms to identify relevant articles: "spinal fusion," "PEEK," "titanium" and "cage."

Results: The novelty of this intervention translates into a paucity of clinical trials, albeit the results of the seven clinical studies that met the criteria for inclusion are promising. All studies reported rate of fusion as a primary outcome. Two studies reported slightly improved fusion in the experimental Ti/PEEK combination cohort, one study identical fusion (91.7 %) and three studies excellent fusion (96, 100 and 94 %) in the Ti/PEEK cohort, although no differences reached statistical significance.

Conclusions: Clinical studies at this early stage demonstrate that Ti/PEEK implants are safe and efficacious, exhibiting similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared to the current standard PEEK. There is clinical evidence substantiating the improved radiographic fusion of Ti/PEEK, albeit the differences were not significant. This field is promising, gaining substantial popularity, and further clinical trials are needed in the future to establish Ti/PEEK cages as a mainstay of clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Surgical Stabilization of the Spine: A Clinical Review of Spinal Fractures, Spondylolisthesis, and Instrumentation Methods.

Enache A, Toader C, Onciul R, Costin H, Glavan L, Covache-Busuioc R J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004655 PMC: 11856911. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041124.

Prospective study on the localization of anterolateral thigh perforator vessel based on mixed reality and artificial algorithm.

Liu Y, Tang X, Wu J, Zhou L, Wu S, Qu Y Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 42(6):795-803.

PMID: 39610077 PMC: 11669935. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024129.

A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage material on fusion rates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Pairojboriboon S, Niruthisard S, Chandhanayingyong C, Monsereenusorn C, Poopan S, Lo S World Neurosurg X. 2024; 23:100392.

PMID: 38884030 PMC: 11176927. DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100392.

An overview of magnesium-based implants in orthopaedics and a prospect of its application in spine fusion.

He X, Li Y, Zou D, Zu H, Li W, Zheng Y Bioact Mater. 2024; 39:456-478.

PMID: 38873086 PMC: 11170442. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.04.026.

Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Chahlavi A Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241253168.

PMID: 38780086 PMC: 11571532. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241253168.

References

Mobbs R, Loganathan A, Yeung V, Rao P . Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg. 2013; 5(3):153-63. PMC: 6583544. DOI: 10.1111/os.12048. View

Young J, Solomon M . How to critically appraise an article. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 6(2):82-91. DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1331. View

Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S . Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012; 7:1215-25. PMC: 3298387. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S28101. View

Park Y, Ha J, Lee Y, Sung N . The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2011; 11(3):205-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.023. View

Martin C, Gruszczynski A, Braunsfurth H, Fallatah S, ONeil J, Wai E . The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(16):1791-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180bc219e. View

Walsh W, Bertollo N, Christou C, Schaffner D, Mobbs R . Plasma-sprayed titanium coating to polyetheretherketone improves the bone-implant interface. Spine J. 2014; 15(5):1041-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.018. View

Weiner B, Fraser R . Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(5):634-40. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00020. View

Ma R, Tang T . Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15(4):5426-45. PMC: 4013573. DOI: 10.3390/ijms15045426. View

Diedrich O, Perlick L, Schmitt O, Kraft C . Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages. J Spinal Disord. 2001; 14(6):522-32. DOI: 10.1097/00002517-200112000-00012. View

10.

Geneletti S, Richardson S, Best N . Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies. Biostatistics. 2008; 10(1):17-31. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn010. View

11.

Scherer R, Huynh L, Ervin A, Taylor J, Dickersin K . ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:79. PMC: 3689057. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-79. View

12.

Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000100. PMC: 2707010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. View

13.

Tumialan L, Pan J, Rodts G, Mummaneni P . The safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a review of 200 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008; 8(6):529-35. DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/6/529. View

14.

Ni J, Zheng Y, Liu N, Wang X, Fang X, Phukan R . Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(4):791-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3745-5. View

15.

Kersten R, van Gaalen S, de Gast A, Oner F . Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013; 15(6):1446-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.030. View

16.

Han C, Lee E, Kim H, Koh Y, Kim K, Ha Y . The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(13):3465-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.030. View

17.

Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Neo M, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Doi K . A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(9):1486-95. PMC: 3175892. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1728-3. View

18.

Choi J, Sung K . Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(1):16-22. PMC: 3454564. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y. View

19.

Portalupi S, von Elm E, Schmucker C, Lang B, Motschall E, Schwarzer G . Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics. Syst Rev. 2013; 2:2. PMC: 3577647. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-2. View

20.

Mobbs R, Chung M, Rao P . Bone graft substitutes for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg. 2013; 5(2):77-85. PMC: 6583221. DOI: 10.1111/os.12030. View