» Articles » PMID: 38873086

An Overview of Magnesium-based Implants in Orthopaedics and a Prospect of Its Application in Spine Fusion

Overview
Journal Bioact Mater
Date 2024 Jun 14
PMID 38873086
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to matching biomechanical properties and significant biological activity, Mg-based implants present great potential in orthopedic applications. In recent years, the biocompatibility and therapeutic effect of magnesium-based implants have been widely investigated in trauma repair. In contrast, the R&D work of Mg-based implants in spinal fusion is still limited. This review firstly introduced the general background for Mg-based implants. Secondly, the mechanical properties and degradation behaviors of Mg and its traditional and novel alloys were reviewed. Then, different surface modification techniques of Mg-based implants were described. Thirdly, this review comprehensively summarized the biological pathways of Mg degradation to promote bone formation in neuro-musculoskeletal circuit, angiogenesis with H-type vessel formation, osteogenesis with osteoblasts activation and chondrocyte ossification as an integrated system. Fourthly, this review followed the translation process of Mg-based implants via updating the preclinical studies in fracture fixation, sports trauma repair and reconstruction, and bone distraction for large bone defect. Furthermore, the pilot clinical studies were involved to demonstrate the reliable clinical safety and satisfactory bioactive effects of Mg-based implants in bone formation. Finally, this review introduced the background of spine fusion surgeryand the challenges of biological matching cage development. At last, this review prospected the translation potential of a hybrid Mg-PEEK spine fusion cage design.

Citing Articles

[Molecular mechanism of magnesium alloy promoting macrophage M2 polarization through modulation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway for tendon-bone healing in rotator cuff injury repair].

Sheng X, Zhang W, Song S, Zhang F, Zhang B, Tian X Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025; 39(2):174-186.

PMID: 39971363 PMC: 11839293. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202410010.

References
1.
Hoy K, Bunger C, Niederman B, Helmig P, Hansen E, Li H . Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(9):2022-9. PMC: 3777065. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2760-2. View

2.
Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, Switzer E, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wirth C . In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials. 2004; 26(17):3557-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049. View

3.
Ostergaard P, Hall M, Xiong G, Zhang D, Earp B . Risk Factors for Implant Removal After Surgical Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures. Orthopedics. 2022; 45(4):e201-e206. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20220225-10. View

4.
Kienle A, Graf N, Wilke H . Does impaction of titanium-coated interbody fusion cages into the disc space cause wear debris or delamination?. Spine J. 2015; 16(2):235-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.038. View

5.
Wu Q, Zhu S, Wang L, Liu Q, Yue G, Wang J . The microstructure and properties of cyclic extrusion compression treated Mg-Zn-Y-Nd alloy for vascular stent application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012; 8:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.12.011. View