Assessment of Radiation Protection Awareness and Knowledge About Radiological Examination Doses Among Italian Radiographers

Overview

Journal Insights Imaging

Publisher Springer

Specialty Radiology

Date 2015 Nov 25

PMID 26596570

Citations 20

Authors

F Paolicchi

F Miniati

L Bastiani

L Faggioni

A Ciaramella

I Creonti

C Sottocornola

C Dionisi

D Caramella

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate radiation protection basic knowledge and dose assessment for radiological procedures among Italian radiographers

Methods: A validated questionnaire was distributed to 780 participants with balanced demographic characteristics and geographic distribution.

Results: Only 12.1 % of participants attended radiation protection courses on a regular basis. Despite 90 % of radiographers stating to have sufficient awareness of radiation protection issues, most of them underestimated the radiation dose of almost all radiological procedures. About 5 % and 4 % of the participants, respectively, claimed that pelvis magnetic resonance imaging and abdominal ultrasound exposed patients to radiation. On the contrary, 7.0 % of the radiographers stated that mammography does not use ionising radiation. About half of participants believed that radiation-induced cancer is not dependent on age or gender and were not able to differentiate between deterministic and stochastic effects. Young radiographers (with less than 3 years of experience) showed a higher level of knowledge compared with the more experienced radiographers.

Conclusions: There is a substantial need for radiographers to improve their awareness of radiation protection issues and their knowledge of radiological procedures. Specific actions such as regular training courses for both undergraduate and postgraduate students as well as for working radiographers must be considered in order to assure patient safety during radiological examinations.

Main Messages: • Radiographers should improve their knowledge on radiation protection issues. • Only 12.1 % of participants attended radiation protection courses on a regular basis. • Specific actions must be considered in order to increase knowledge and awareness.

Citing Articles

Radiation Safety Awareness Among Non-radiology Staff at Tabuk Hospitals, Saudi Arabia.

Wally S, Abu Sabir S, Alharbi S, Albalawi I, Alharbi K, Binsulaiman N Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70603.

PMID: 39483573 PMC: 11525843. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70603.

Investigating knowledge of DRLs, image quality and radiation dose in PET/CT and CT imaging among medical imaging professionals.

Alhorani Q, Al-Ibraheem A, Rawashdeh M, Alkhybari E, Sabarudin A, A Latiff R Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30030.

PMID: 38707442 PMC: 11066384. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30030.

Assessment of radiographers' knowledge about radiation doses and DRLs in computed tomography departments in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Aldahery S Saudi Pharm J. 2023; 31(11):101820.

PMID: 37928978 PMC: 10622684. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101820.

Awareness of Radiation Protection and Common Radiation Dose Levels Among Healthcare Workers.

Alyousef K, Assiri A, Almutairi S, Aldalham T, Felimban G Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2023; 6(1):1-5.

PMID: 37260860 PMC: 10229030. DOI: 10.36401/JQSH-22-14.

The practice of radiation protection in an interventional neuroradiology service.

Sebastiao L, Flor R, Anderson T Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023; 20(3):430-437.

PMID: 36793471 PMC: 9904828. DOI: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-748.

References

OSullivan J, OConnor O, ORegan K, Clarke B, Burgoyne L, Ryan M . An assessment of medical students' awareness of radiation exposures associated with diagnostic imaging investigations. Insights Imaging. 2012; 1(2):86-92. PMC: 3259343. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-010-0009-8. View

Goske M, Applegate K, Boylan J, Butler P, Callahan M, Coley B . The 'Image Gently' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol. 2008; 38(3):265-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-007-0743-3. View

Zhou G, Wong D, Nguyen L, Mendelson R . Student and intern awareness of ionising radiation exposure from common diagnostic imaging procedures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010; 54(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02132.x. View

Lee R, Chu W, Graham C, Rainer T, Ahuja A . Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological investigations: a comparison between radiologists and non-radiologists. Emerg Med J. 2011; 29(4):306-8. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200481. View

Brenner D, Hall E . Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. View

Lauer M . Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(9):841-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0904735. View

Singh S, Kalra M, Moore M, Shailam R, Liu B, Toth T . Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology. 2009; 252(1):200-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2521081554. View

. White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging. 2012; 2(4):357-362. PMC: 3259338. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-011-0108-1. View

Hricak H, Brenner D, Adelstein S, Frush D, Hall E, Howell R . Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2010; 258(3):889-905. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101157. View

10.

Furlow B . Radiation dose in computed tomography. Radiol Technol. 2010; 81(5):437-50. View

11.

Vassileva J, Rehani M, Applegate K, Ahmed N, Al-Dhuhli H, Al-Naemi H . IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols. Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(3):623-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2639-3. View

12.

Heyer C, Hansmann J, Peters S, Lemburg S . Paediatrician awareness of radiation dose and inherent risks in chest imaging studies--a questionnaire study. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 76(2):288-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.014. View

13.

Yurt A, Cavusoglu B, Gunay T . Evaluation of awareness on radiation protection and knowledge about radiological examinations in healthcare professionals who use ionized radiation at work. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2014; 23(2):48-53. PMC: 4067876. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.00719. View

14.

Foley S, Evanoff M, Rainford L . A questionnaire survey reviewing radiologists' and clinical specialist radiographers' knowledge of CT exposure parameters. Insights Imaging. 2013; 4(5):637-46. PMC: 3781242. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-013-0282-4. View

15.

Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti D, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson H, Flynn M . Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012; 307(22):2400-9. PMC: 3859870. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5960. View

16.

Paolicchi F, Faggioni L, Bastiani L, Molinaro S, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C . Real practice radiation dose and dosimetric impact of radiological staff training in body CT examinations. Insights Imaging. 2013; 4(2):239-44. PMC: 3609953. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-013-0241-0. View

17.

Lee C, Haims A, Monico E, Brink J, Forman H . Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004; 231(2):393-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2312030767. View

18.

Brown N, Jones L . Knowledge of medical imaging radiation dose and risk among doctors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013; 57(1):8-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02469.x. View

19.

Nosek A, Hartin Jr C, Bass K, Glick P, Caty M, Dayton M . Are facilities following best practices of pediatric abdominal CT scans?. J Surg Res. 2012; 181(1):11-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.036. View

20.

Miglioretti D, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee R, Weinmann S, Solberg L . The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167(8):700-7. PMC: 3936795. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311. View