» Articles » PMID: 33709644

The Importance of Public Health in Radiology and Radiation Protection

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Mar 12
PMID 33709644
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ionizing radiation belongs to the basic physical factors that can be measured. We forget often about its risks and the possible damage to our health. The imaging methods which use the ionizing radiation increase the diagnostics quality and they have become a certainty for many medical workers. Therefore, they are being used without rational thinking many times. With this is related to increasing the cumulative dose of patients. Next problem can be radiation safety knowledge of medical workers. The enormous increase in the use of sources ionizing radiation in medicine and rapid development, there may be a disproportionate acquisition of radiation safety knowledge of healthcare workers. At the same time, constant attention must be paid to the biological effects of radiation and realize epidemiology studies. In all the areas mentioned the public health has space. However, it is sad that presently, the radiation safety is not considered important enough in Public Health.  Based on many sources, it is safe to say that this is a major problem, because the public health itself can play an important role in radiation safety. It is important to point out, that safety and effectivity of using the source of ionizing radiation is one of the main components of Good Medical Practice.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the attitudes of radiologic technology students and graduates toward their study major and career prospects: A cross-sectional study.

Mazaheri F, Tahmasbi M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(6):e2144.

PMID: 38817884 PMC: 11136640. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2144.


Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore.

Cheong K, Syed Mahmud S, Chng N, Kwek G, Yan C, Yeung M J Med Access. 2024; 8:27550834231222382.

PMID: 38306366 PMC: 10822080. DOI: 10.1177/27550834231222382.


Radiographers' perceptions on the quality of managing general radiographic paediatric examinations through the use of a reflective tool.

Caruana K, Hayre C, Makanjee C PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295603.

PMID: 38060598 PMC: 10703265. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295603.


Assessment of radiographers' knowledge about radiation doses and DRLs in computed tomography departments in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Aldahery S Saudi Pharm J. 2023; 31(11):101820.

PMID: 37928978 PMC: 10622684. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101820.

References
1.
Reeves R, Ang L, Bahadorani J, Naghi J, Dominguez A, Palakodeti V . Invasive Cardiologists Are Exposed to Greater Left Sided Cranial Radiation: The BRAIN Study (Brain Radiation Exposure and Attenuation During Invasive Cardiology Procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(9):1197-1206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.027. View

2.
Carpeggiani C, Kraft G, Caramella D, Semelka R, Picano E . Radioprotection (un)awareness in cardiologists, and how to improve it. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 28(6):1369-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9937-8. View

3.
Shabani F, Hasanzadeh H, Emadi A, Mirmohammadkhani M, Bitarafan-Rajabi A, Abedelahi A . Radiation Protection Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) in Interventional Radiology. Oman Med J. 2018; 33(2):141-147. PMC: 5889843. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2018.26. View

4.
Ivanov V, Kashcheev V, Chekin S, Menyaylo A, Pryakhin E, Tsyb A . Estimation of risk from medical radiation exposure based on effective and organ dose: how much difference is there?. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013; 155(3):317-28. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct008. View

5.
Meisinger Q, Stahl C, Andre M, Kinney T, Newton I . Radiation Protection for the Fluoroscopy Operator and Staff. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207(4):745-754. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16556. View