» Articles » PMID: 22358387

White Paper on Radiation Protection by the European Society of Radiology

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Feb 24
PMID 22358387
Citations 16
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the past decade, the medical effective dose per caput has increased in most European countries because of CT; it now ranges between 0.4 and 2 mSv/year. The biological impact of diagnostic imaging exposure is dominated by stochastic effects: based on the linear-no-threshold hypothesis, the risk of cancer induction is estimated to increase proportionally to organ dose, reaching around 0.5% at an effective dose of 100 mSv. The risk is higher the younger the age at the time of exposure, it is different for different organs, and women are more susceptible than men. Fluoroscopy-based imaging, above all intervention, may reach the dose threshold for deterministic effects, observed most often at the skin above around 3 Gy, and it is also the major source of occupational exposure in radiology. This white paper discusses the role of justification, evidence-based referral guidelines, optimization, diagnostic reference levels, clinical audits and quality assurance programs. The ESR strongly supports education and training of the medical staff involved in imaging by ionizing radiation. It disseminates information regarding radiation protection, takes initiatives, cooperates with partners and supports projects in justification as well as optimization. To reach these aims, the ESR cooperates with other organizations involved in radiation protection.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of Low-Dose and Low-Contrast Media Volume Approach in Computed Tomography Cardiovascular Imaging Reconstructed with Model-Based Algorithm.

Ippolito D, Porta M, Maino C, Riva L, Ragusi M, Giandola T Tomography. 2024; 10(2):286-298.

PMID: 38393291 PMC: 10891780. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10020023.


Lung ultrasound and supine chest X-ray use in modern adult intensive care: mapping 30 years of advancement (1993-2023).

Vetrugno L, Biasucci D, Deana C, Spadaro S, Lombardi F, Longhini F Ultrasound J. 2024; 16(1):7.

PMID: 38345653 PMC: 10861418. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-023-00351-4.


Application of low-dose CT combined with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in oncologic patients during follow-up: dose reduction and image quality.

Ippolito D, Maino C, Pecorelli A, Salemi I, Gandola D, Riva L Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1124):20201223.

PMID: 34233459 PMC: 8764930. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201223.


Evidenced-based radiology? A single-institution review of imaging referral appropriateness including monetary and dose estimates for inappropriate scans.

Ryan J, Hollywood A, Stirling A, Glynn M, MacMahon P, Bolster F Ir J Med Sci. 2019; 188(4):1385-1389.

PMID: 30875006 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02005-8.


Adequacy of Completion of Computed Tomography Scan Request Forms at a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan: A Clinical Audit.

Zafar U, Abid A, Ahmad B, Ahmad H, Zafar F, Baig M Cureus. 2018; 10(10):e3470.

PMID: 30588413 PMC: 6303179. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3470.


References
1.
Marshall N, Chapple C, Kotre C . Diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45(12):3833-46. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/323. View

2.
Neofotistou V, Vano E, Padovani R, Kotre J, Dowling A, Toivonen M . Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(10):2259-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1831-x. View

3.
. European Commission guidelines on clinical audit. Statement by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging. 2012; 2(2):97-98. PMC: 3259394. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-011-0065-8. View