» Articles » PMID: 26567113

Phase 1 Evaluation of [(64)Cu]DOTA-Patritumab to Assess Dosimetry, Apparent Receptor Occupancy, and Safety in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Nov 15
PMID 26567113
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, dosimetry, and apparent receptor occupancy (RO) of [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab, a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody directed against HER3/ERBB3 in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

Procedures: Dosimetry subjects (n = 5) received [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab and underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) at 3, 24, and 48 h. Evaluable RO subjects (n = 3 out of 6) received [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab at day 1 and day 8 (after 9.0 mg/kg patritumab) followed by PET/CT at 24 h post-injection. Endpoints included safety, tumor uptake, and efficacy.

Results: The tumor SUVmax (± SD) was 5.6 ± 4.5, 3.3 ± 1.7, and 3.0 ± 1.1 at 3, 24, and 48 h in dosimetry subjects. The effective dose and critical organ dose (liver) averaged 0.044 ± 0.008 mSv/MBq and 0.46 ± 0.086 mGy/MBq, respectively. In RO subjects, tumor-to-blood ratio decreased from 1.00 ± 0.32 at baseline to 0.57 ± 0.17 after stable patritumab, corresponding to a RO of 42.1 ± 3.

Conclusions: [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab was safe. These limited results suggest that this PET-based method can be used to determine tumor-apparent RO.

Citing Articles

Measurement of specific and nonspecific tissue uptake of antibodies in tumor by SPECT imaging and nonlinear compartmental modeling.

Cho N, Ho J, Rosario G, Yu S, Ferl G, Boswell C EJNMMI Res. 2025; 15(1):15.

PMID: 39994098 PMC: 11850665. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-025-01207-9.


Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology.

Mohr P, van Sluis J, Lub-de Hooge M, Lammertsma A, Brouwers A, Tsoumpas C Front Nucl Med. 2024; 4:1360710.

PMID: 39355220 PMC: 11440922. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1360710.


ImmunoPET Targeting Receptor Tyrosine Kinase: Clinical Applications.

Linguanti F, Abenavoli E, Calabretta R, Berti V, Lopci E Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38136430 PMC: 10741542. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245886.


HER3: Toward the Prognostic Significance, Therapeutic Potential, Current Challenges, and Future Therapeutics in Different Types of Cancer.

Majumder A Cells. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37947595 PMC: 10648638. DOI: 10.3390/cells12212517.


Feasibility of Co-Targeting HER3 and EpCAM Using Seribantumab and DARPin-Toxin Fusion in a Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Model.

Xu T, Schulga A, Konovalova E, Rinne S, Zhang H, Vorontsova O Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(3).

PMID: 36769161 PMC: 9917732. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032838.


References
1.
Goldenberg D . Monoclonal antibodies in cancer detection and therapy. Am J Med. 1993; 94(3):297-312. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90062-t. View

2.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

3.
LoRusso P, Janne P, Oliveira M, Rizvi N, Malburg L, Keedy V . Phase I study of U3-1287, a fully human anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(11):3078-87. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3051. View

4.
Lewis M, Kao J, Anderson A, Shively J, Raubitschek A . An improved method for conjugating monoclonal antibodies with N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl DOTA. Bioconjug Chem. 2001; 12(2):320-4. DOI: 10.1021/bc0000886. View

5.
Gullick W . The c-erbB3/HER3 receptor in human cancer. Cancer Surv. 1996; 27:339-49. View