» Articles » PMID: 26551441

Outcomes of in Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: an Analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2015 Nov 10
PMID 26551441
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the characteristics of IVF cycles for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was used and to evaluate indications for PGD and treatment outcomes associated with this procedure as compared with cycles without PGD with the data from the U.S. National ART Surveillance System.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: None.

Patient(s): Fresh autologous cycles that involved transfer of at least one embryo at blastocyst when available.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): PGD indications and age-specific reproductive outcomes.

Result(s): There were a total of 97,069 non-PGD cycles and 9,833 PGD cycles: 55.6% were performed for aneuploidy screening (PGD Aneuploidy), 29.1% for other reasons (PGD Other), and 15.3% for genetic testing (PGD Genetic). In comparison to non-PGD cycles, PGD Aneuploidy cycles showed a decreased odds of miscarriage among women 35-37 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87) and women >37 years (aOR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.70); and an increased odds of clinical pregnancy (aOR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.34), live-birth delivery (aOR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.26-1.62), and multiple-birth delivery (aOR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.52-2.57) among women >37 years.

Conclusion(s): Aneuploidy screening was the most common indication for PGD. Use of PGD was not observed to be associated with an increased odds of clinical pregnancy or live birth for women <35 years. PGD for aneuploidy was associated with a decreased odds of miscarriage for women >35 years, but an increased odds of a live-birth and a multiple live-birth delivery among women >37 years.

Citing Articles

Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).

Claffey A, Ngo A, McIntire D, Doody K, Doody K J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39910000 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9.


PGT-A: what's it for, what's wrong?.

Viville S, Aboulghar M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(1):63-69.

PMID: 39847200 PMC: 11806166. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03400-0.


MiR-135a-5p regulates window of implantation by suppressing pinopodes development and decidualization of endometrial stromal cells.

He Y, Ju Y, Lei H, Dong J, Jin N, Lu J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(6):1645-1659.

PMID: 38512656 PMC: 11224217. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03088-8.


Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) offers an alternative strategy to prevent children from being born with hereditary neurological diseases or metabolic diseases dominated by nervous system phenotypes: a retrospective....

Zou W, Li M, Wang X, Lu H, Hao Y, Chen D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1245-1259.

PMID: 38470552 PMC: 11143151. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03057-1.


Preimplantation sex selection via in vitro fertilization: time for a reappraisal.

Kushnir V, Adashi E, Cohen I F S Rep. 2023; 4(3):241-243.

PMID: 37719093 PMC: 10504547. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.05.006.


References
1.
Adashi E, Wyden R . Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures. JAMA. 2011; 306(10):1135-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1249. View

2.
Marquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahce M, Alikani M, Munne S . Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 1(1):17-26. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61988-8. View

3.
Harper J, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta S . The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(3):234-47. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr052. View

4.
Collins S . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: technical advances and expanding applications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 25(3):201-6. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835faafe. View

5.
. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90(5 Suppl):S136-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.062. View