Embryo Quality, Ploidy, and Transfer Outcomes in Male Versus Female Blastocysts

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2021 Jun 4

PMID 34086149

Authors

Christopher P Moutos

William G Kearns

Sarah E Farmer

Jon P Richards

Antonio F Saad

John R Crochet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The goal is to determine if variations exist between male and female blastocysts in preimplantation measurements of quality and ploidy and in vitro fertilization elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted from a private fertility center's database of blastocysts undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, along with details of eSET from this screened cohort. Main outcomes included preimplantation embryo quality and sex-specific eSET outcomes.

Results: A total of 3708 embryos from 578 women were evaluated, with 45.9% male and 54.1% female. The majority were High grade. No difference existed between embryo sex and overall morphological grade, inner cell mass or trophectoderm grade, or blastocyst transformation day. Female blastocysts had a higher aneuploidy rate than male blastocysts (P < 0.001). Five hundred thirty-nine eSETs from 392 women were evaluated, with High grade embryos more likely to have implantation (P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy (P < 0.001), and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.018) than Mid or Low grade embryos. Day 5 blastocysts were more likely to have implantation (P = 0.018), clinical pregnancy (P = 0.005), and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.018) than day 6 blastocysts. Male and female embryos had similar transfer outcomes, although female day 5 blastocysts were more likely to result in clinical pregnancy (P = 0.012), but not ongoing pregnancy, than female day 6 blastocysts. Male eSET outcomes did not differ by blastocyst transformation day.

Conclusion: Male and female embryos have comparable grade and quality; however, female embryos were more likely to be aneuploid. Ongoing pregnancy rates did not differ by embryo sex. Day 5 embryos had more favorable transfer outcomes than day 6 embryos.

References

Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D . Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013; 20(2):117-26. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gat073. View

Poulsen V, Ingerslev H, Kirkegaard K . Elective embryo transfers on Day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on Day 5. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(6):1238-1243. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex059. View

. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(6):1418-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.035. View

Hill M, Richter K, Heitmann R, Graham J, Tucker M, DeCherney A . Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(5):1283-1289.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003. View

Chang J, Boulet S, Jeng G, Flowers L, Kissin D . Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012. Fertil Steril. 2015; 105(2):394-400. PMC: 5023328. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.018. View

Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J . Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertil Steril. 2006; 87(3):519-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.058. View

Gardner D, Larman M, Thouas G . Sex-related physiology of the preimplantation embryo. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010; 16(8):539-47. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaq042. View

Csokmay J, Hill M, Cioppettini F, Miller K, Scott Jr R, Frattarelli J . Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2008; 92(3):913-917. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1741. View

Dean J, Chapman M, Sullivan E . The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures--an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2006. BJOG. 2010; 117(13):1628-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02731.x. View

10.

Richter K, Ginsburg D, Shipley S, Lim J, Tucker M, Graham J . Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(2):354-362.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022. View

11.

Capalbo A, Rienzi L . Mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(5):1098-1106. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.023. View

12.

Chang H, Lee J, Jee B, Suh C, Kim S . Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008; 91(6):2381-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.066. View

13.

Gardner D, Wale P . Analysis of metabolism to select viable human embryos for transfer. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(4):1062-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.004. View

14.

Bronet F, Nogales M, Martinez E, Ariza M, Rubio C, Garcia-Velasco J . Is there a relationship between time-lapse parameters and embryo sex?. Fertil Steril. 2014; 103(2):396-401.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.050. View

15.

McCoy R . Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm. Trends Genet. 2017; 33(7):448-463. PMC: 5484399. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.04.001. View

16.

Ginsburg E, Baker V, Racowsky C, Wantman E, Goldfarb J, Stern J . Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic screening in the United States: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group paper. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(4):865-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1139. View

17.

Rosenwaks Z, Handyside A, Fiorentino F, Gleicher N, Paulson R, Schattman G . The pros and cons of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: clinical and laboratory perspectives. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(3):353-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.002. View

18.

Haas J, Meriano J, Laskin C, Bentov Y, Barzilay E, Casper R . Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(12):1553-1557. PMC: 5171889. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0818-x. View

19.

Barash O, Ivani K, Willman S, Rosenbluth E, Wachs D, Hinckley M . Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(8):1007-1016. PMC: 5533677. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0944-0. View

20.

Lou H, Li N, Zhang X, Sun L, Wang X, Hao D . Does the sex ratio of singleton births after frozen single blastocyst transfer differ in relation to blastocyst development?. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):72. PMC: 7362517. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00623-x. View