» Articles » PMID: 26491551

The Measurement of Intraocular Biomarkers in Various Stages of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Multiplex XMAP Technology

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Oct 23
PMID 26491551
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose. To determine the intraocular levels of growth factors and cytokines in patients with various degrees of severity of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using multiplex xMAP technology. Methods. A prospective cohort study of 61 eyes from 56 patients who were divided into 3 groups based on the severity of PDR. Patients in group number 1 are those who presented PDR with no need of repeated surgical intervention; patients in group number 2 had repeated vitreous bleeding; and patients in group number 3 had refractory neovascular glaucoma. The concentrations of proangiogenic, antiangiogenic, inflammatory, and neurotrophic factors were measured in intraocular fluid. The results were also compared with levels of factors measured in 50 eyes from 50 patients prior to senile cataract surgery (control group). Results. Patients with refractory neovascular glaucoma (the highest clinical severity group) had higher levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) (median1 37.19; median3 384.74; P = .00096), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ-1) (median1 49.00; median3 414.40; P = .0017), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (median1 211.62; median3 352.82; P = .0454) compared with other PDR patients. Conclusions. Results of our study imply that levels of IL-6, TGFβ-1, and VEGF correlate with the severity of PDR.

Citing Articles

ABHD1 Facilitates Intermediate Filament-Mediated Endothelial Cell Chemotaxis by Regulating KRT1 and KRT2 in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Liu X, Fang J, Niu T, Xing X, Shi X, Xiao Y J Diabetes Res. 2024; 2024:5513165.

PMID: 39619568 PMC: 11606687. DOI: 10.1155/jdr/5513165.


Potential Roles of Anti-Inflammatory Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds Targeting Inflammation in Microvascular Complications of Diabetes.

Kaabi Y Molecules. 2022; 27(21).

PMID: 36364178 PMC: 9657994. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217352.


Changes in aqueous and vitreous inflammatory cytokine levels in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mason R, Minaker S, Lahaie Luna G, Bapat P, Farahvash A, Garg A Eye (Lond). 2022; .

PMID: 35672457 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02127-x.


Decorin Concentrations in Aqueous Humor of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Low S, Vaidya T, Gadde S, Mochi T, Kumar D, Kassem I Life (Basel). 2021; 11(12).

PMID: 34947953 PMC: 8707400. DOI: 10.3390/life11121421.


Commentary: Recent concepts of pathophysiology and advancements in treatment strategies of diabetic retinopathy.

Singh A, Sharma I, Das G, Sahu P, Rohatgi J Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(11):3050-3051.

PMID: 34708740 PMC: 8725151. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2606_21.


References
1.
Saint-Geniez M, Maharaj A, Walshe T, Tucker B, Sekiyama E, Kurihara T . Endogenous VEGF is required for visual function: evidence for a survival role on müller cells and photoreceptors. PLoS One. 2008; 3(11):e3554. PMC: 2571983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003554. View

2.
Murugeswari P, Shukla D, Rajendran A, Kim R, Namperumalsamy P, Muthukkaruppan V . Proinflammatory cytokines and angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and eales' disease. Retina. 2008; 28(6):817-24. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816576d5. View

3.
Kellar K, Iannone M . Multiplexed microsphere-based flow cytometric assays. Exp Hematol. 2002; 30(11):1227-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00922-0. View

4.
Simo R, Carrasco E, Garcia-Ramirez M, Hernandez C . Angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008; 2(1):71-98. DOI: 10.2174/157339906775473671. View

5.
Sohn H, Han D, Kim I, Oh I, Kim K, Lee D . Changes in aqueous concentrations of various cytokines after intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152(4):686-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.033. View