» Articles » PMID: 32852613

Effects of Emixustat Hydrochloride in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase 2 Study

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32852613
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of oral emixustat hydrochloride on pro-angiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor, as well as other ophthalmic parameters, in subjects with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Methods: Twenty-three patients with PDR, with or without diabetic macular edema (DME), were assigned to emixustat or placebo in daily oral doses ranging from 5 to 40 mg over a step-up titration period, for 84 days. The main outcome measures included levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TGFβ-1, and VEGF in the aqueous humor.

Results: Seven of 12 subjects (58%) who were randomized to emixustat and 11 of 12 subjects (92%) who were randomized to placebo completed the study. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed for changes in any of the aqueous humor cytokines tested. However, median VEGF levels were slightly reduced in the emixustat but not the placebo group (- 70.0 pg/mL versus + 42.7 pg/mL, or - 11.8% versus + 6.7%). In a post hoc analysis of all subjects (with or without DME), statistically significant differences between treatment arms in mean changes from baseline in central subfield thickness (CST; emixustat - 11.9 μm, placebo + 36.2 μm; P = 0.076) and total macular volume (TMV; emixustat - 0.13 mm, placebo + 0.23 mm; P = 0.026) were observed, both favoring emixustat. Emixustat's safety profile was consistent with prior studies (i.e., the adverse events of delayed dark adaptation and visual impairment were more common in subjects treated with emixustat).

Conclusion: Although this pilot study did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in changes in aqueous humor cytokine levels between the emixustat and placebo groups, VEGF levels were slightly reduced in the emixustat but not in the placebo group. In addition, statistically significant differences favoring the emixustat group were observed in CST and TMV among all subjects. These data warrant further investigation of emixustat's potential therapeutic effects in diabetic retinopathy.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02753400 (April 2016).

Citing Articles

Clinical Evidence of a Photoreceptor Origin in Diabetic Retinal Disease.

Rajagopal R, Kern T Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 5(1):100591.

PMID: 39328824 PMC: 11426126. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100591.


Increasing Energetic Demands on Photoreceptors in Diabetes Corrects Retinal Lipid Dysmetabolism and Reduces Subsequent Microvascular Damage.

Zhang S, Wei X, Bowers M, Jessberger S, Golczak M, Semenkovich C Am J Pathol. 2023; 193(12):2144-2155.

PMID: 37741454 PMC: 10777362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.09.004.


Full-field stimulus threshold testing: a scoping review of current practice.

Shi L, Hall A, Thompson D Eye (Lond). 2023; 38(1):33-53.

PMID: 37443335 PMC: 10764876. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02636-3.


Tuning the Metabolic Stability of Visual Cycle Modulators through Modification of an RPE65 Recognition Motif.

Bassetto M, Zaluski J, Li B, Zhang J, Badiee M, Kiser P J Med Chem. 2023; 66(12):8140-8158.

PMID: 37279401 PMC: 10824489. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00461.


The role of inflammation in immune system of diabetic retinopathy: Molecular mechanisms, pathogenetic role and therapeutic implications.

Yue T, Shi Y, Luo S, Weng J, Wu Y, Zheng X Front Immunol. 2022; 13:1055087.

PMID: 36582230 PMC: 9792618. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1055087.


References
1.
Coyne K, Margolis M, Kennedy-Martin T, Baker T, Klein R, Paul M . The impact of diabetic retinopathy: perspectives from patient focus groups. Fam Pract. 2004; 21(4):447-53. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh417. View

2.
Solomon S, Chew E, Duh E, Sobrin L, Sun J, VanderBeek B . Diabetic Retinopathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(3):412-418. PMC: 5402875. DOI: 10.2337/dc16-2641. View

3.
Blinder K, Dugel P, Chen S, Jumper J, Walt J, Hollander D . Anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic macular edema in clinical practice: effectiveness and patterns of use (ECHO Study Report 1). Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11:393-401. PMC: 5328320. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S128509. View

4.
Guariguata L, Whiting D, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw J . Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 103(2):137-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002. View

5.
Kusuhara S, Fukushima Y, Ogura S, Inoue N, Uemura A . Pathophysiology of Diabetic Retinopathy: The Old and the New. Diabetes Metab J. 2018; 42(5):364-376. PMC: 6202564. DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0182. View