Statistical Learning is Related to Early Literacy-Related Skills

Overview

Journal Read Writ

Date 2015 Oct 20

PMID 26478658

Citations 32

Authors

Mercedes Spencer

Michael P Kaschak

John L Jones

Christopher J Lonigan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that statistical learning, or the ability to use statistical information to learn the structure of one's environment, plays a role in young children's acquisition of linguistic knowledge. Although most research on statistical learning has focused on language acquisition processes, such as the segmentation of words from fluent speech and the learning of syntactic structure, some recent studies have explored the extent to which individual differences in statistical learning are related to literacy-relevant knowledge and skills. The present study extends on this literature by investigating the relations between two measures of statistical learning and multiple measures of skills that are critical to the development of literacy-oral language, vocabulary knowledge, and phonological processing-within a single model. Our sample included a total of 553 typically developing children from prekindergarten through second grade. Structural equation modeling revealed that statistical learning accounted for a unique portion of the variance in these literacy-related skills. Practical implications for instruction and assessment are discussed.

Citing Articles

Speech Stream Composition Affects Statistical Learning: Behavioral and Neural Evidence.

Soares A, Paiva D, Lema A, Pereira D, Rodrigues A, Oliveira H Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002530 PMC: 11852644. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020198.

Mind wandering enhances statistical learning.

Vekony T, Farkas B, Brezoczki B, Mittner M, Csifcsak G, Simor P iScience. 2025; 28(2):111703.

PMID: 39906558 PMC: 11791256. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111703.

Semantic and Syntactic Predictions in Reading Aloud: Are Good Predictors Good Statistical Learners?.

Gavard E, Ziegler J J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):40.

PMID: 38737818 PMC: 11086592. DOI: 10.5334/joc.363.

Contribution of statistical learning in learning to read across languages.

Ren J, Wang M PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0298670.

PMID: 38527080 PMC: 10962809. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298670.

Seeking the neural representation of statistical properties in print during implicit processing of visual words.

Liu J, Fan T, Chen Y, Zhao J NPJ Sci Learn. 2023; 8(1):60.

PMID: 38102191 PMC: 10724295. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-023-00209-3.

References

Nash H, Snowling M . Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: a controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006; 41(3):335-54. DOI: 10.1080/13682820600602295. View

Stanovich K . Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model. J Learn Disabil. 1988; 21(10):590-604. DOI: 10.1177/002221948802101003. View

Thiessen E, Saffran J . When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Dev Psychol. 2003; 39(4):706-16. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.706. View

Thiessen E, Kronstein A, Hufnagle D . The extraction and integration framework: a two-process account of statistical learning. Psychol Bull. 2012; 139(4):792-814. DOI: 10.1037/a0030801. View

Ashby J, Clifton Jr C . The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition. 2005; 96(3):B89-100. PMC: 1479854. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.006. View

Conway C, Christiansen M . Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(10):905-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x. View

Burgess S, Lonigan C . Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: evidence from a preschool sample. J Exp Child Psychol. 1998; 70(2):117-41. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2450. View

Conway C, Christiansen M . Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(1):24-39. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24. View

Conway C, Pisoni D, Anaya E, Karpicke J, Henning S . Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants. Dev Sci. 2010; 14(1):69-82. PMC: 3050521. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00960.x. View

10.

Stoodley C, Ray N, Jack A, Stein J . Implicit learning in control, dyslexic, and garden-variety poor readers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1145:173-83. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1416.003. View

11.

Harm M, Seidenberg M . Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychol Rev. 2004; 111(3):662-720. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662. View

12.

Trueswell J, Sekerina I, Hill N, Logrip M . The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition. 1999; 73(2):89-134. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00032-3. View

13.

Gebauer G, Mackintosh N . Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):34-54. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.34. View

14.

Kuhl P . Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5(11):831-43. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1533. View

15.

Finn A, Hudson Kam C . The curse of knowledge: first language knowledge impairs adult learners' use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition. 2008; 108(2):477-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.002. View

16.

Snowling M . The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. J Exp Child Psychol. 1980; 29(2):294-305. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(80)90021-1. View

17.

Fine A, Jaeger T . Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. Cogn Sci. 2013; 37(3):578-91. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12022. View

18.

MacDonald M, Pearlmutter N, Seidenberg M . The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected]. Psychol Rev. 1994; 101(4):676-703. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676. View

19.

Arciuli J, von Koss Torkildsen J . Advancing Our Understanding of the Link between Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition: The Need for Longitudinal Data. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:324. PMC: 3431614. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00324. View

20.

Khanna M, Boland J . Children's use of language context in lexical ambiguity resolution. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009; 63(1):160-93. DOI: 10.1080/17470210902866664. View