» Articles » PMID: 12859124

When Cues Collide: Use of Stress and Statistical Cues to Word Boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old Infants

Overview
Journal Dev Psychol
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2003 Jul 16
PMID 12859124
Citations 115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior research suggests that stress cues are particularly important for English-hearing infants' detection of word boundaries. It is unclear, though, how infants learn to attend to stress as a cue to word segmentation. This series of experiments was designed to explore infants' attention to conflicting cues at different ages. Experiment 1 replicated previous findings: When stress and statistical cues indicated different word boundaries, 9-month-old infants used syllable stress as a cue to segmentation while ignoring statistical cues. However, in Experiment 2, 7-month-old infants attended more to statistical cues than to stress cues. These results raise the possibility that infants use their statistical learning abilities to locate words in speech and use those words to discover the regular pattern of stress cues in English. Infants at different ages may deploy different segmentation strategies as a function of their current linguistic experience.

Citing Articles

Use of Statistical and Acoustic Cues for Speech Segmentation in French-Learning 7-Month-Old Infants and French-Speaking Adults.

Marimon M, Berdasco-Munoz E, Hohle B, Nazzi T Open Mind (Camb). 2025; 9:189-209.

PMID: 39906869 PMC: 11793197. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00184.


Enhanced pitch discrimination in autistic children with unexpected bilingualism.

Dumont C, Belenger M, Eigsti I, Kissine M Autism Res. 2024; 17(9):1844-1852.

PMID: 39188092 PMC: 11534530. DOI: 10.1002/aur.3221.


Infants show systematic rhythmic motor responses while listening to rhythmic speech.

Boll-Avetisyan N, Shandala A, Langus A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1370007.

PMID: 38952821 PMC: 11216316. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370007.


Chunk boundaries disrupt dependency processing in an AG: Reconciling incremental processing and discrete sampling.

Lo C, Meyer L PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305333.

PMID: 38889141 PMC: 11185458. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305333.


Semantic and Syntactic Predictions in Reading Aloud: Are Good Predictors Good Statistical Learners?.

Gavard E, Ziegler J J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):40.

PMID: 38737818 PMC: 11086592. DOI: 10.5334/joc.363.