» Articles » PMID: 26477691

Age-related Changes in Aortic 3D Blood Flow Velocities and Wall Shear Stress: Implications for the Identification of Altered Hemodynamics in Patients with Aortic Valve Disease

Overview
Date 2015 Oct 20
PMID 26477691
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate age-related changes in peak systolic aortic 3D velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) in healthy controls and to investigate the importance of age-matching for 3D mapping of abnormal aortic hemodynamics in bicuspid aortic valve disease (BAV).

Materials And Methods: 4D flow MRI (fields strengths = 1.5-3T; resolution = 2.2-3.9 × 1.7-2.6 × 2.2-4.0 mm(3) ; Venc = 150-250 cm/s; TE/TR/FA = 2.3-2.8/4.7-5.4msec/7-15°) was performed in 56 controls (age range: 19-78 years) and in two BAV patient groups each consisting of 10 subjects (group 1: 20-29 years, group 2: 52-57 years). Heat maps showing abnormal 3D velocity and WSS were created for the BAV patients by comparison with an age-matched and with an unmatched control group. The fraction of the aorta exposed to abnormal velocity/WSS was calculated relative to the total aortic volume/surface.

Results: Significant inverse relationships between age and healthy velocity/WSS were found (R(2)  = 0.32/0.39, P < 0.001). For BAV group 1, abnormally elevated velocity/WSS was overestimated when compared with older controls (51-60 years) than when correctly age-matched (∼25 ± 14% vs. ∼8 ± 5%). For BAV group 2, abnormally decreased velocity/WSS was overestimated when compared with younger controls (21-30 years) than when correctly age-matched (∼9 ± 7% vs. 1 ± 1%).

Conclusion: Significant correlations exist between age and peak systolic velocity and WSS. Therefore, robust age-matching is important when creating abnormal 3D aortic velocity and WSS maps for patients with BAV.

Citing Articles

Robustness of 4D flow MRI derived aortic wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity across different protocols in healthy controls and in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Dushfunian D, Maroun A, Berhan H, Baraboo J, Johnson E, Jarvis K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 41(1):137-149.

PMID: 39652207 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03299-1.


Assessment of abnormal transvalvular flow and wall shear stress direction for pediatric/young adults with bicuspid aortic valve: A cross-sectional four-dimensional flow study.

Fujiwara T, Malone L, Chatfield K, Berthusen A, Fonseca B, Browne L J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024; 26(2):101102.

PMID: 39326557 PMC: 11647488. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101102.


Assessment of descending aortic blood flow velocities with continuous wave Doppler echocardiography among healthy Children in South East Nigeria.

Chinawa J, Chinawa A, Chukwu B, Onyia J Malawi Med J. 2024; 36(1):1-6.

PMID: 39086365 PMC: 11287811. DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v36i.1.


Biomechanical Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis by Means of a Virtual Stress Test: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Study.

Govindarajan V, Kolanjiyil A, Wanna C, Kim H, Prakash S, Chandran K Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 52(2):414-424.

PMID: 37957528 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03389-6.


Estimation of z-scores of cardiac structures in healthy children in Southeast Nigeria.

Chinawa J, Chukwu B, Chinawa A Ir J Med Sci. 2023; 193(2):689-698.

PMID: 37861940 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03542-z.


References
1.
Hope M, Sigovan M, Wrenn S, Saloner D, Dyverfeldt P . MRI hemodynamic markers of progressive bicuspid aortic valve-related aortic disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 40(1):140-5. PMC: 4010553. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24362. View

2.
Clough R, Waltham M, Giese D, Taylor P, Schaeffter T . A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55(4):914-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.005. View

3.
Stalder A, Russe M, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M . Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60(5):1218-31. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21778. View

4.
Carabello B . Introduction to aortic stenosis. Circ Res. 2013; 113(2):179-85. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300156. View

5.
Malaisrie S, Carr J, Mikati I, Rigolin V, Yip B, Lapin B . Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is more diagnostic than 2-dimensional echocardiography in determining the presence of bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 144(2):370-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.068. View