» Articles » PMID: 26476728

Vertebral Lesion Distribution in Multiple Myeloma--assessed by Reduced-dose Whole-body MDCT

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2015 Oct 19
PMID 26476728
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To observe the distribution and potential distribution patterns of osteolytic and sclerotic vertebral involvement in a representative collective of multiple myeloma patients.

Materials And Methods: A total of 66 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma at initial diagnosis or during follow-up were examined by multidetector reduced-dose computed tomography to evaluate the distribution of bone lesions along the spine with focus on size, location, and lesion character. Confirmation of diagnosis was performed by comparison to follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance tomography. If >50% of all detected malignant lesions occurred in one spinal segment, the distribution pattern was called cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral, otherwise a "mixed" pattern was classified.

Results: Of a total number of 933 osseous spine lesions, 632 (67.7%) were classified as malignant (98.9% of them osteolytic) and 293 (31.5%) as benign. The distribution pattern analysis yielded two patients (3.8%) with a cervical, 26 (50%) with a thoracic, 4 (7.7%) with a lumbar, one (1.9%) with a sacral pattern, and 19 cases (36.6%) showed a mixed distribution pattern. Segment-wise, the mean lesion size was 6.52 ± 2.76 mm (cervical), 8.97 ± 5.43 mm (thoracic), 11.97 ± 7.11 mm (lumbar), and 17.5 ± 16.465 (sacral), whilst, related to the vertebra size, the lesion/vertebra size ratio is decreasing through the whole spine beginning from the top.

Conclusions: Multiple myeloma bone lesions occur preferably and are larger in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Moreover, a specific distribution pattern is present in about 60%.

Citing Articles

Prospective Multireader Evaluation of Photon-counting CT for Multiple Myeloma Screening.

Schwartz F, Vinson E, Spritzer C, Colglazier R, Samei E, French R Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2022; 4(6):e220073.

PMID: 36399038 PMC: 9713593. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220073.


Limitations of routine skeletal survey: detection of critical but asymptomatic cervical spine lesion in multiple myeloma.

Batool S, Iftikhar A, Ahmad A, Anwer F BMJ Case Rep. 2017; 2017.

PMID: 28676476 PMC: 5747788. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221231.


Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma.

Dutoit J, Verstraete K Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 46(6):733-750.

PMID: 28289855 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2609-6.

References
1.
. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003; 121(5):749-57. View

2.
Lacy M, Gertz M, Hanson C, Inwards D, Kyle R . Multiple myeloma associated with diffuse osteosclerotic bone lesions: a clinical entity distinct from osteosclerotic myeloma (POEMS syndrome). Am J Hematol. 1997; 56(4):288-93. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8652(199712)56:4<288::aid-ajh16>3.0.co;2-5. View

3.
Croucher P, Apperley J . Bone disease in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1999; 103(4):902-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.01082.x. View

4.
Anselmetti G, Manca A, Montemurro F, Hirsch J, Chiara G, Grignani G . Percutaneous vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma: prospective long-term follow-up in 106 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011; 35(1):139-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0111-4. View

5.
Bannas P, Kroger N, Adam G, Derlin T . [Modern imaging techniques in patients with multiple myeloma]. Rofo. 2012; 185(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325405. View