» Articles » PMID: 9205246

Vertebral Compression Fractures in Multiple Myeloma. Part I. Distribution and Appearance at MR Imaging

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 1997 Jul 1
PMID 9205246
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study the appearance and distribution of vertebral compression fractures on magnetic resonance (MR) images in patients with multiple myeloma.

Materials And Methods: Two hundred twenty-four vertebral compression fractures were studied on 216 sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo and T2*-weighted gradient-echo MR images of the thoracolumbar spine obtained before and during treatment in 37 patients with multiple myeloma. Vertebral compression fractures observed at diagnosis and during follow-up were determined as being benign- or malignant-appearing at MR imaging according to literature criteria, and their distribution along the spine was recorded.

Results: One hundred forty-nine (67%) of the 224 vertebral compression fractures appeared benign; 75 (33%) appeared malignant. Of the 37 patients, 14 (38%) had only benign-appearing vertebral compression fractures at diagnosis. One hundred five fractures (87%) were observed between T-6 and L-4, and 112 (50%) occurred between T-11 and L-3. Eight (4%) vertebral compression fractures involved the upper three thoracic vertebrae.

Conclusion: Most vertebral compression fractures in patients with multiple myeloma appear benign at MR imaging, and their distribution is similar to that observed in osteoporotic fractures. The possibility of multiple myeloma should not be excluded in patients with benign-appearing vertebral compression fractures at MR imaging.

Citing Articles

Assessment of inter- and intraobserver agreement for META score in distinguishing osteoporotic from multiple myeloma vertebral fractures.

Abdala E, Oliveira J, Pontes M, Ganeo A, Nogueira-Barbosa M, Herrero C Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(8):3268-3274.

PMID: 38717495 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08287-6.


A 3D Radiomics-Based Artificial Neural Network Model for Benign Versus Malignant Vertebral Compression Fracture Classification in MRI.

Chiari-Correia N, Nogueira-Barbosa M, Chiari-Correia R, Azevedo-Marques P J Digit Imaging. 2023; 36(4):1565-1577.

PMID: 37253895 PMC: 10406770. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00847-4.


AGREEMENT ON MRI DIAGNOSIS IN COMPRESSIVE MALIGNANT VERTEBRAL FRACTURES.

Dos Santos I, Herrero C, Pratali R, Agnollitto P, Waib F, Nogueira-Barbosa M Acta Ortop Bras. 2023; 31(spe1):e258926.

PMID: 37082164 PMC: 10112358. DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220233101e258926.


[Imaging for Multiple Myeloma according to the Recent International Myeloma Working Group Guidelines: Analysis of Image Acquisition Techniques and Response Evaluation in Whole-Body MRI according to MY-RADS].

Son A, Chung H J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023; 84(1):150-169.

PMID: 36818702 PMC: 9935955. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0179.


Density and mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone-A review.

Ohman-Magi C, Holub O, Wu D, Hall R, Persson C JOR Spine. 2022; 4(4):e1176.

PMID: 35005442 PMC: 8717096. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1176.