» Articles » PMID: 26451900

An Evaluation of Commercial Pedometers for Monitoring Slow Walking Speed Populations

Overview
Date 2015 Oct 10
PMID 26451900
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pedometers are considered desirable devices for monitoring physical activity. Two population groups of interest include patients having undergone surgery in the lower extremities or who are otherwise weakened through disease, medical treatment, or surgery procedures, as well as the slow walking senior population. For these population groups, pedometers must be able to perform reliably and accurately at slow walking speeds. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the step count accuracy of three commercially available pedometers, the Yamax (Tokyo, Japan) Digi-Walker(®) SW-200 (YM), the Omron (Kyoto, Japan) HJ-720 (OM), and the Fitbit (San Francisco, CA) Zip (FB), at slow walking speeds, specifically at 1, 2, and 3 km/h, and to raise awareness of the necessity of focusing research on step-counting devices and algorithms for slow walking populations.

Materials And Methods: Fourteen participants 29.93 ±4.93 years of age were requested to walk on a treadmill at the three specified speeds, in four trials of 100 steps each. The devices were worn by the participants on the waist belt. The pedometer counts were recorded, and the error percentage was calculated.

Results: The error rate of all three evaluated pedometers decreased with the increase of speed: at 1 km/h the error rates varied from 87.11% (YM) to 95.98% (FB), at 2 km/h the error rates varied from 17.27% (FB) to 46.46% (YM), and at 3 km/h the error rates varied from 22.46% (YM) to a slight overcount of 0.70% (FB).

Conclusions: It was observed that all the evaluated devices have high error rates at 1 km/h and mixed error rates at 2 km/h, and at 3 km/h the error rates are the smallest of the three assessed speeds, with the OM and the FB having a slight overcount. These results show that research on pedometers' software and hardware should focus more on accurate step detection at slow walking speeds.

Citing Articles

Accelerometers can correctly count orthopaedic patients' early post-operative steps while using walking aids.

Tsamassiotis S, Schwarze M, Gehring P, Karkosch R, Tucking L, Einfeldt A J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70134.

PMID: 39759096 PMC: 11696250. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70134.


Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers to measure and coach patients with lower limb lymphoedema.

Blondeel A, Devoogdt N, Asnong A, Geraerts I, De Groef A, Heroes A PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305768.

PMID: 39024359 PMC: 11257309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305768.


Adding Mobile Elements to Online Physical Activity Interventions for Adults Aged Over 50 Years: Prototype Development Study.

Collombon E, Peels D, Bolman C, de Bruijn G, Lechner L JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e42394.

PMID: 36696157 PMC: 9909523. DOI: 10.2196/42394.


Smartphone Pedometer Sensor Application for Evaluating Disease Activity and Predicting Comorbidities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Validation Study.

Wagner S, Gregersen R, Henriksen L, Hauge E, Keller K Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36502098 PMC: 9735816. DOI: 10.3390/s22239396.


The Accuracy of Commercially Available Fitness Trackers in Patients after Stroke.

Holubova A, Mala E, Hoidekrova K, Petioky J, duris A, Muzik J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19).

PMID: 36236491 PMC: 9573007. DOI: 10.3390/s22197392.