» Articles » PMID: 32375676

Pacemaker Detected Active Minutes Are Superior to Pedometer-based Step Counts in Measuring the Response to Physical Activity Counseling in Sedentary Older Adults

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 May 8
PMID 32375676
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In patients with permanent pacemakers (PPM), physical activity (PA) can be monitored using embedded accelerometers to measure pacemaker detected active hours (PDAH), a strong predictor of mortality. We examined the impact of a PA Counseling (PAC) intervention on increasing activity as measured by PDAH and daily step counts.

Methods: Thirteen patients (average age 80 ± 6 years, 84.6% women) with implanted Medtronic PPMs with a ≤ 2 PDAH daily average were included in this study. Patients were randomized to Usual Care (UC, N = 6) or a Physical Activity Counseling Intervention (PACI, N = 7) groups. Step count and PDAH data were obtained at baseline, following a 12-week intervention, then 12 weeks after intervention completion. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Pearson's r, chi-square, and general linear models for repeated measures.

Results: PDAH significantly differed by time point for all subject combined (P = 0.01) but not by study group. Subjects with baseline gait speeds of > 0.8 m/sec were responsible for the increases in PDAH observed. Step counts did not differ over time in the entire cohort or by study group. Step count and PDAH significantly correlated at baseline (r = 0.60, P = 0.03). This correlation disappeared by week 12.

Conclusion(s): PDAH can be used to monitor PA and PA interventions and may be superior to hip-worn pedometers in detecting activity. A significant increase in PA, regardless of treatment group, suggests that patient awareness of the ability to monitor PA through a PPM increases PA in these patients, particularly in patients with gait speeds of < 0.8 m/sec.

Trial Registration: ClincalTrials.gov NCT03052829. Date of Registration: 2/14/2017.

Citing Articles

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical Activity in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

Sassone B, Mandini S, Grazzi G, Mazzoni G, Myers J, Pasanisi G J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020; 40(5):285-286.

PMID: 32804796 PMC: 7720812. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000539.

References
1.
Hamilton M, Hamilton D, Zderic T . Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007; 56(11):2655-67. DOI: 10.2337/db07-0882. View

2.
Alai M, Beig J, Kumar S, Yaqoob I, Hafeez I, Lone A . Prevalence and characterization of coronary artery disease in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias requiring pacemaker implantation. Indian Heart J. 2017; 68 Suppl 3:S21-S25. PMC: 5198875. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.013. View

3.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

4.
Bradshaw P, Stobie P, Knuiman M, Briffa T, Hobbs M . Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart. 2014; 1(1):e000177. PMC: 4265147. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177. View

5.
Hollman J, McDade E, Petersen R . Normative spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults. Gait Posture. 2011; 34(1):111-8. PMC: 3104090. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.024. View