» Articles » PMID: 35388891

Wearable Devices to Monitor Recovery After Abdominal Surgery: Scoping Review

Overview
Journal BJS Open
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Apr 7
PMID 35388891
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Wearable devices have been proposed as a novel method for monitoring patients after surgery to track recovery, identify complications early, and improve surgical safety. Previous studies have used a heterogeneous range of devices, methods, and analyses. This review aimed to examine current methods and wearable devices used for monitoring after abdominal surgery and identify knowledge gaps requiring further investigation.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted given the heterogeneous nature of the evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies of wearable devices for monitoring of adult patients within 30 days after abdominal surgery were eligible for inclusion.

Results: A total of 78 articles from 65 study cohorts, with 5153 patients were included. Thirty-one different wearable devices were used to measure vital signs, physiological measurements, or physical activity. The duration of postoperative wearable device use ranged from 15 h to 3 months after surgery. Studies mostly focused on physical activity metrics (71.8 per cent). Continuous vital sign measurement and physical activity tracking both showed promise for detecting postoperative complications earlier than usual care, but conclusions were limited by poor device precision, adherence, occurrence of false alarms, data transmission problems, and retrospective data analysis. Devices were generally well accepted by patients, with high levels of acceptance, comfort, and safety.

Conclusion: Wearable technology has not yet realized its potential to improve postoperative monitoring. Further work is needed to overcome technical limitations, improve precision, and reduce false alarms. Prospective assessment of efficacy, using an intention-to-treat approach should be the focus of further studies.

Citing Articles

Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Continuous Postoperative Vital Signs Monitoring in Patients Recovering from Trauma Surgery.

van Melzen R, Haveman M, Schuurmann R, van Amsterdam K, El Moumni M, Tabak M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409419 PMC: 11479365. DOI: 10.3390/s24196379.


Physical Activity in Cancer Rehabilitation and Technology Acceptance: Results From the "Oncology in Motion" Project.

Biancuzzi H, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Apicerni B, Cobianchi L, Bednarova R Transl Med UniSa. 2024; 26(2):122-130.

PMID: 39385795 PMC: 11460528. DOI: 10.37825/2239-9747.1063.


Wearable Devices in Colorectal Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Kavallieros K, Karakozis L, Hayward R, Giannas E, Selvaggi L, Kontovounisios C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001367 PMC: 11240327. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132303.


Postoperative Complications and Mobilization Following Major Abdominal Surgery With Versus Without Fitness Tracker-based Feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): A Student-led Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of the CHIR-Net SIGMA Study Group.

Mihaljevic A Ann Surg. 2024; 280(2):202-211.

PMID: 38984800 PMC: 11224573. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006232.


Artificial intelligence in surgery.

Varghese C, Harrison E, OGrady G, Topol E Nat Med. 2024; 30(5):1257-1268.

PMID: 38740998 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02970-3.


References
1.
Drummond G, Bates A, Mann J, Arvind D . Characterization of breathing patterns during patient-controlled opioid analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111(6):971-8. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet259. View

2.
Low C, Danko M, Durica K, Kunta A, Mulukutla R, Ren Y . A Real-Time Mobile Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior Before and After Cancer Surgery: Usability and Feasibility Study. JMIR Perioper Med. 2021; 3(1):e17292. PMC: 7709849. DOI: 10.2196/17292. View

3.
Ward W, Meeker C, Handorf E, Hill M, Einarson M, Alpaugh R . Feasibility of Fitness Tracker Usage to Assess Activity Level and Toxicities in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021; 5:125-133. PMC: 8189607. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.20.00117. View

4.
Hollis R, Graham L, Lazenby J, Brown D, Taylor B, Heslin M . A Role for the Early Warning Score in Early Identification of Critical Postoperative Complications. Ann Surg. 2015; 263(5):918-23. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001514. View

5.
Patel M, Asch D, Volpp K . Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015; 313(5):459-60. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.14781. View