» Articles » PMID: 26403293

A New Semantic Vigilance Task: Vigilance Decrement, Workload, and Sensitivity to Dual-task Costs

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Sep 26
PMID 26403293
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cognitive resource theory is a common explanation for both the performance decline in vigilance tasks, known as the vigilance decrement, and the limited ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. The limited supply of cognitive resources may be utilized faster than they are replenished resulting in a performance decrement, or may need to be allocated among multiple tasks with some performance cost. Researchers have proposed both domain-specific, for example spatial versus verbal processing resources, and domain general cognitive resources. One challenge in testing the domain specificity of cognitive resources in vigilance is the current lack of difficult semantic vigilance tasks which reliably produce a decrement. In the present research, we investigated whether the vigilance decrement was found in a new abbreviated semantic discrimination vigilance task, and whether there was a performance decrement in said vigilance task when paired with a word recall task, as opposed to performed individually. As hypothesized, a vigilance decrement in the semantic vigilance task was found in both the single-task and dual-task conditions, along with reduced vigilance performance in the dual-task condition and reduced word recall in the dual-task condition. This is consistent with cognitive resource theory. The abbreviated semantic vigilance task will be a useful tool for researchers interested in determining the specificity of cognitive resources utilized in vigilance tasks.

Citing Articles

Evidence of elevated situational awareness for active duty soldiers during navigation of a virtual environment.

Enders L, Gordon S, Roy H, Rohaly T, Dalangin B, Jeter A PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0298867.

PMID: 38728266 PMC: 11086823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298867.


HD-tDCS mitigates the executive vigilance decrement only under high cognitive demands.

Hemmerich K, Lupianez J, Martin-Arevalo E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7865.

PMID: 38570619 PMC: 10991279. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57917-y.


A review of cyber vigilance tasks for network defense.

Guidetti O, Speelman C, Bouhlas P Front Neuroergon. 2024; 4:1104873.

PMID: 38234467 PMC: 10790933. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1104873.


The interference of negative emotional stimuli on semantic vigilance performance in a dual-task setting.

Zsido A, Matuz A, Julia B, Darnai G, Csatho A Biol Futur. 2023; 75(1):105-115.

PMID: 37778004 DOI: 10.1007/s42977-023-00180-5.


Mapping between cognitive theories and psycho-physiological models of attention system performance.

Guidetti O, Speelman C, Bouhlas P Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(18):10122-10138.

PMID: 37492014 PMC: 10502801. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad271.


References
1.
Caggiano D, Parasuraman R . The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005; 11(5):932-7. PMC: 1351035. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196724. View

2.
Helton W, Russell P . Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention. Psychol Res. 2010; 75(5):384-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0316-1. View

3.
Ariga A, Lleras A . Brief and rare mental "breaks" keep you focused: deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition. 2011; 118(3):439-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.007. View

4.
Fernandez-Duque D, Posner M . Brain imaging of attentional networks in normal and pathological states. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001; 23(1):74-93. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.23.1.74.1217. View

5.
Helton W, Russell P . Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 224(3):429-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3322-2. View