Feature Absence-presence and Two Theories of Lapses of Sustained Attention

Overview

Journal Psychol Res

Specialty Psychology

Date 2010 Nov 25

PMID 21103888

Citations 17

Authors

William S Helton

Paul N Russell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We conducted two experiments using search asymmetry to test two theories of sustained attention lapses currently debated in the literature: the mindlessness theory and the resource theory. In the first experiment, participants performed a feature present and a feature absent sustained attention to response task (SART). The mindlessness theory predicts more commission errors in a feature present SART than a feature absent SART, while resource theory predicts the reverse, i.e. more commission errors in a feature absent SART than feature present SART. The latter occurred. In the second study, participants performed a naturalistic scene vigilance task with targets more analogous to a feature present search or more analogous to a feature absent search. The vigilance decrement occurred, with an increase in reaction time to targets over the course of the vigil. The decrement was more pronounced with the targets more analogous to a feature absent search. Overall, the results of both studies support a resource theory of sustained attention lapses, not the mindlessness theory.

Citing Articles

Mental Fatigue and Sports Performance of Athletes: Theoretical Explanation, Influencing Factors, and Intervention Methods.

Wu C, Zhao Y, Yin F, Yi Y, Geng L, Xu X Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39767266 PMC: 11673376. DOI: 10.3390/bs14121125.

Physical activity, problematic smartphone use, and burnout among Chinese college students.

Zhu L, Hou J, Zhou B, Xiao X, Wang J, Jia W PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16270.

PMID: 37842034 PMC: 10576493. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16270.

Vigilance decrement and mind-wandering in sustained attention tasks: Two sides of the same coin?.

Martinez-Perez V, Andreu A, Sandoval-Lentisco A, Tortajada M, Palmero L, Castillo A Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1122406.

PMID: 37056308 PMC: 10086236. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1122406.

Moment-to-Moment Continuous Attention Fluctuation Monitoring through Consumer-Grade EEG Device.

Zhang S, Yan Z, Sapkota S, Zhao S, Ooi W Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(10).

PMID: 34069027 PMC: 8156270. DOI: 10.3390/s21103419.

Neural signatures of vigilance decrements predict behavioural errors before they occur.

Karimi-Rouzbahani H, Woolgar A, Rich A Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 33830017 PMC: 8060034. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.60563.

References

Parasuraman R . Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science. 1979; 205(4409):924-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.472714. View

Treisman A, Gormican S . Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol Rev. 1988; 95(1):15-48. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.1.15. View

Weissman D, Roberts K, Visscher K, Woldorff M . The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(7):971-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1727. View

Helton W, Warm J . Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 129(1):18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.002. View

Quinlan P . Visual feature integration theory: past, present, and future. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(5):643-73. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.643. View

Shaw T, Warm J, Finomore V, Tripp L, Matthews G, Weiler E . Effects of sensory modality on cerebral blood flow velocity during vigilance. Neurosci Lett. 2009; 461(3):207-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.008. View

Manly T, Robertson I, Galloway M, Hawkins K . The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia. 1999; 37(6):661-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00127-4. View

Helton W, Hayrynen L, Schaeffer D . Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature. Brain Cogn. 2009; 71(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.03.001. View

Helton W, Weil L, Middlemiss A, Sawers A . Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). Conscious Cogn. 2010; 19(1):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.006. View

10.

Hancock P, Warm J . A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Hum Factors. 1989; 31(5):519-37. DOI: 10.1177/001872088903100503. View

11.

Helton W, Hollander T, Warm J, Matthews G, Dember W, Wallaart M . Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. Br J Psychol. 2005; 96(Pt 2):249-61. DOI: 10.1348/000712605X38369. View

12.

Forster S, Lavie N . Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load. Cognition. 2009; 111(3):345-55. PMC: 2706319. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006. View

13.

Hitchcock E, Dember W, Warm J, Moroney B, See J . Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention. Hum Factors. 2000; 41(3):365-72. DOI: 10.1518/001872099779610987. View

14.

Warm J, Parasuraman R, Matthews G . Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Hum Factors. 2008; 50(3):433-41. DOI: 10.1518/001872008X312152. View

15.

McVay J, Kane M . Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009; 35(1):196-204. PMC: 2750806. DOI: 10.1037/a0014104. View

16.

Temple J, Warm J, Dember W, Jones K, LaGrange C, Matthews G . The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Hum Factors. 2000; 42(2):183-94. DOI: 10.1518/001872000779656480. View

17.

TEICHNER W . The detection of a simple visual signal as a function of time of watch. Hum Factors. 1974; 16(4):339-53. DOI: 10.1177/001872087401600402. View

18.

Helton W, Shaw T, Warm J, Matthews G, Hancock P . Effects of warned and unwarned demand transitions on vigilance performance and stress. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2008; 21(2):173-84. DOI: 10.1080/10615800801911305. View

19.

Buck L . Reaction time as a measure of perceptual vigilance. Psychol Bull. 1966; 65(5):291-304. DOI: 10.1037/h0023207. View

20.

Giambra L . A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Conscious Cogn. 1995; 4(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1001. View