» Articles » PMID: 38570619

HD-tDCS Mitigates the Executive Vigilance Decrement Only Under High Cognitive Demands

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Apr 3
PMID 38570619
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maintaining vigilance is essential for many everyday tasks, but over time, our ability to sustain it inevitably decreases, potentially entailing severe consequences. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) has proven to be useful for studying and improving vigilance. This study explores if/how cognitive load affects the mitigatory effects of HD-tDCS on the vigilance decrement. Participants (N = 120) completed a modified ANTI-Vea task (single or dual load) while receiving either sham or anodal HD-tDCS over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC). This data was compared with data from prior studies (N = 120), where participants completed the standard ANTI-Vea task (triple load task), combined with the same HD-tDCS protocol. Against our hypotheses, both the single and dual load conditions showed a significant executive vigilance (EV) decrement, which was not affected by the application of rPPC HD-tDCS. On the contrary, the most cognitively demanding task (triple task) showed the greatest EV decrement; importantly, it was also with the triple task that a significant mitigatory effect of the HD-tDCS intervention was observed. The present study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the specific effects of HD-tDCS on the vigilance decrement considering cognitive demands. This can ultimately contribute to reconciling heterogeneous effects observed in past research and fine-tuning its future clinical application.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive brain stimulation in research and therapy.

Desarkar P, Vicario C, Soltanlou M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29334.

PMID: 39592705 PMC: 11599756. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79039-1.


Can transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation mitigate vigilance loss? Examining the effects of stimulation at individualized versus constant current intensity.

Luna F, Lupianez J, Konig S, Garscha U, Fischer R Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14670.

PMID: 39169561 PMC: 11775886. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14670.

References
1.
Giordani L, Crisafulli A, Cantarella G, Avenanti A, Ciaramelli E . The role of posterior parietal cortex and medial prefrontal cortex in distraction and mind-wandering. Neuropsychologia. 2023; 188:108639. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108639. View

2.
Antal A, Luber B, Brem A, Bikson M, Brunoni A, Cohen Kadosh R . Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2022; 7:146-165. PMC: 9207555. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.05.002. View

3.
Fertonani A, Ferrari C, Miniussi C . What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 126(11):2181-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.015. View

4.
Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Honey C, Wedeen V . Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 2008; 6(7):e159. PMC: 2443193. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159. View

5.
Smit A, Eling P, Coenen A . Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004; 115(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.001. View