» Articles » PMID: 26351676

Requirement for Transient Metal Ions Revealed Through Computational Analysis for DNA Polymerase Going in Reverse

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Sep 10
PMID 26351676
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA polymerases facilitate faithful insertion of nucleotides, a central reaction occurring during DNA replication and repair. DNA synthesis (forward reaction) is "balanced," as dictated by the chemical equilibrium by the reverse reaction of pyrophosphorolysis. Two closely spaced divalent metal ions (catalytic and nucleotide-binding metals) provide the scaffold for these reactions. The catalytic metal lowers the pKa of O3' of the growing primer terminus, and the nucleotide-binding metal facilitates substrate binding. Recent time-lapse crystallographic studies of DNA polymerases have identified an additional metal ion (product metal) associated with pyrophosphate formation, leading to the suggestion of its possible involvement in the reverse reaction. Here, we establish a rationale for a role of the product metal using quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical calculations of the reverse reaction in the confines of the DNA polymerase β active site. Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis identifies essential residues and metal-binding sites necessary for pyrophosphorolysis. The results indicate that the catalytic metal site must be occupied by a magnesium ion for pyrophosphorolysis to occur. Critically, the product metal site is occupied by a magnesium ion early in the pyrophosphorolysis reaction path but must be removed later. The proposed dynamic nature of the active site metal ions is consistent with crystallographic structures. The transition barrier for pyrophosphorolysis was estimated to be significantly higher than that for the forward reaction, consistent with kinetic activity measurements of the respective reactions. These observations provide a framework to understand how ions and active site changes could modulate the internal chemical equilibrium of a reaction that is central to genome stability.

Citing Articles

Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II substrate binding and metal coordination using a free-electron laser.

Lin G, Barnes C, Weiss S, Dutagaci B, Qiu C, Feig M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(36):e2318527121.

PMID: 39190355 PMC: 11388330. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2318527121.


Effects of the Y432S Cancer-Associated Variant on the Reaction Mechanism of Human DNA Polymerase κ.

Maghsoud Y, Roy A, Leddin E, Cisneros G J Chem Inf Model. 2024; 64(10):4231-4249.

PMID: 38717969 PMC: 11181361. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00339.


In crystallo observation of active site dynamics and transient metal ion binding within DNA polymerases.

Chang C, Zhou G, Gao Y Struct Dyn. 2023; 10(3):034702.

PMID: 37333512 PMC: 10275647. DOI: 10.1063/4.0000187.


Watching right and wrong nucleotide insertion captures hidden polymerase fidelity checkpoints.

Jamsen J, Shock D, Wilson S Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3193.

PMID: 35680862 PMC: 9184648. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30141-w.


In crystallo observation of three metal ion promoted DNA polymerase misincorporation.

Chang C, Lee Luo C, Gao Y Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):2346.

PMID: 35487947 PMC: 9054841. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30005-3.


References
1.
Beard W, Wilson S . Structure and mechanism of DNA polymerase β. Biochemistry. 2014; 53(17):2768-80. PMC: 4018062. DOI: 10.1021/bi500139h. View

2.
Senn H, Thiel W . QM/MM studies of enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007; 11(2):182-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.684. View

3.
Batra V, Beard W, Shock D, Krahn J, Pedersen L, Wilson S . Magnesium-induced assembly of a complete DNA polymerase catalytic complex. Structure. 2006; 14(4):757-66. PMC: 1868394. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.01.011. View

4.
Nakamura T, Zhao Y, Yamagata Y, Hua Y, Yang W . Watching DNA polymerase η make a phosphodiester bond. Nature. 2012; 487(7406):196-201. PMC: 3397672. DOI: 10.1038/nature11181. View

5.
Beard W, Wilson S . Purification and domain-mapping of mammalian DNA polymerase beta. Methods Enzymol. 1995; 262:98-107. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)62013-3. View