Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels Among Nutritionally At-Risk Individuals

Overview

Journal Nutrients

Date 2015 Aug 26

PMID 26305255

Citations 34

Authors

Pauline Ducrot

Caroline Mejean

Chantal Julia

Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot

Mathilde Touvier

Leopold K Fezeu

Serge Hercberg

Sandrine Peneau

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In the ongoing debate about front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labels, little data exist regarding nutritionally at-risk populations, although they are critical targets of prevention programs. This study aimed to compare the impact of FOP labels on the ability to rank products according to their nutritional quality among French adults potentially at risk of poor dietary quality (N = 14,230). Four labels were evaluated: Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), 5-Color Nutrition Label (5-CNL), Green Tick (Tick), along with a reference without label. Mixed models were used to assess how individual characteristics and FOP labels were associated with the ability to rank products. Older participants and those with a lower educational level, income, nutritional knowledge, and likelihood of reading nutrition facts were less skilled at ranking food products according to nutritional quality. Compared with individual characteristics, nutrition labels had an increased impact on food product ranking ability. Overall, 5-CNL corresponded to the highest rate of correct responses, followed by MTL, GDA, and Tick (p < 0.0001). The strongest impact of 5-CNL was observed among individuals with no nutritional knowledge (odds ratio (OR): 20.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 13.19-31.06). Therefore, 5-CNL appeared to be effective at informing consumers, including those who are nutritionally at-risk, about the nutritional quality of food products.

Citing Articles

The Nutri-Score Scale-A Tool for Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Processed Meat Products Available on the Polish Market.

Czech-Zalubska K, Didkowska A, Klich D, Jackowska-Tracz A, Zarzynska J, Anusz K Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38542738 PMC: 10975717. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060827.

Comparative understanding and preference of Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery in a sample of Spanish consumers.

Fialon M, Babio N, Salas-Salvado J, Galan P, Kesse-Guyot E, Touvier M Eur J Public Health. 2023; 33(2):293-298.

PMID: 36661062 PMC: 10066476. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad002.

Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers' behaviour and policy implications.

Stiletto A, Trestini S PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277048.

PMID: 36395097 PMC: 9671382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277048.

Uncovering the Effect of European Policy-Making Initiatives in Addressing Nutrition-Related Issues: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis on Front-of-Pack Labels.

Mazzu M, Baccelloni A, Finistauri P Nutrients. 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36014929 PMC: 9414449. DOI: 10.3390/nu14163423.

Health Literacy and Its Associations with Understanding and Perception of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels among Higher Education Students.

Hoge A, Labeye M, Donneau A, Nekoee H, Husson E, Guillaume M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).

PMID: 35886603 PMC: 9319699. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148751.

References

Mejean C, Macouillard P, Peneau S, Lassale C, Hercberg S, Castetbon K . Association of perception of front-of-pack labels with dietary, lifestyle and health characteristics. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90971. PMC: 3951292. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090971. View

Hercberg S, Castetbon K, Czernichow S, Malon A, Mejean C, Kesse E . The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:242. PMC: 2881098. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-242. View

Hodgkins C, Raats M, Fife-Schaw C, Peacock M, Groppel-Klein A, Koenigstorfer J . Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness. Br J Nutr. 2015; 113(10):1652-63. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515000264. View

Rayner M, Boaz A, Higginson C . Consumer use of health-related endorsements on food labels in the United Kingdom and Australia. J Nutr Educ. 2002; 33(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60006-7. View

Grunert K, Fernandez-Celemin L, Wills J, Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann S, Nureeva L . Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2010; 18(3):261-277. PMC: 2967247. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0. View

Lassale C, Galan P, Castetbon K, Peneau S, Mejean C, Hercberg S . Differential association between adherence to nutritional recommendations and body weight status across educational levels: a cross-sectional study. Prev Med. 2013; 57(5):488-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.030. View

Fischer L, Sutherland L, Kaley L, Fox T, Hasler C, Nobel J . Development and implementation of the guiding stars nutrition guidance program. Am J Health Promot. 2011; 26(2):e55-63. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.100709-QUAL-238. View

Sacks G, Rayner M, Swinburn B . Impact of front-of-pack 'traffic-light' nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promot Int. 2009; 24(4):344-52. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dap032. View

Helfer P, Shultz T . The effects of nutrition labeling on consumer food choice: a psychological experiment and computational model. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014; 1331:174-185. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12461. View

10.

Sacks G, Veerman J, Moodie M, Swinburn B . 'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling and 'junk-food' tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010; 35(7):1001-9. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2010.228. View

11.

Beydoun M, Wang Y . Do nutrition knowledge and beliefs modify the association of socio-economic factors and diet quality among US adults?. Prev Med. 2007; 46(2):145-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.016. View

12.

Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D . Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14(8):1496-506. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010003290. View

13.

Hersey J, Wohlgenant K, Arsenault J, Kosa K, Muth M . Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. Nutr Rev. 2013; 71(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1111/nure.12000. View

14.

Hawley K, Roberto C, Bragg M, Liu P, Schwartz M, Brownell K . The science on front-of-package food labels. Public Health Nutr. 2012; 16(3):430-9. PMC: 10271311. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012000754. View

15.

Gorton D, Ni Mhurchu C, Chen M, Dixon R . Nutrition labels: a survey of use, understanding and preferences among ethnically diverse shoppers in New Zealand. Public Health Nutr. 2008; 12(9):1359-65. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008004059. View

16.

Lobstein T, Davies S . Defining and labelling 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' food. Public Health Nutr. 2008; 12(3):331-40. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008002541. View

17.

van Herpen E, van Trijp H . Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints. Appetite. 2011; 57(1):148-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.011. View

18.

Roberto C, Bragg M, Schwartz M, Seamans M, Musicus A, Novak N . Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(2):134-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.022. View

19.

Andreeva V, Salanave B, Castetbon K, Deschamps V, Vernay M, Kesse-Guyot E . Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015; 69(9):893-8. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-205263. View

20.

van Kleef E, Dagevos H . The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014; 55(3):291-303. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.653018. View