» Articles » PMID: 26244040

Escaping the Trap of Allergic Rhinitis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Aug 6
PMID 26244040
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rhinitis is often the first symptom of allergy but is frequently ignored and classified as a nuisance condition. Ironically it has the greatest socioeconomic burden worldwide caused by its impact on work and on daily life. However, patients appear reticent to seek professional advice, visiting their doctor only when symptoms become 'intolerable' and often when their usual therapy proves ineffective. Clearly, it's time for new and more effective allergic rhinitis treatments. MP29-02 (Dymista®; Meda, Solna, Sweden) is a new class of medication for moderate to severe seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis if monotherapy with either intranasal antihistamine or intranasal corticosteroids is not considered sufficient. MP29-02 is a novel formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP). It benefits not only from the incorporation of two active agents, but also from a novel formulation; its lower viscosity, smaller droplet size, larger volume (137 μl) and wider spray angle ensure optimal coverage of, and retention on the nasal mucosa and contribute to its clinical efficacy. In clinical trials, patients treated with MP29-02 experienced twice the symptom relief as those treated with FP and AZE, who in turn exhibited significantly greater symptom relief than placebo-patients. Indeed, the advantage of MP29-02 over FP was approximately the same as that shown for FP over placebo. The advantage of MP29-02 was particularly evident in those patients for whom nasal congestion is predominant, with MP29-02 providing three times the nasal congestion relief of FP (p = 0.0018) and five times the relief of AZE (p = 0.0001). Moreover, patients treated with MP29-02 achieved each and every response up to a week faster than those treated with FP or AZE alone and in real life 1 in 2 patients reported the perception of well-controlled disease after only 3 days. MP29-02's superiority over FP was also apparent long-term in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis or non-allergic rhinitis, with statistical significance noted from the first day of treatment, with treatment difference maintained for a full year. Taken together, these data suggest that MP29-02 may improve the lives of many of our patients, enabling them to finally escape the allergic rhinitis trap.

Citing Articles

The Use of Azelastine Hydrochloride/Fluticasone Propionate in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Asia: A Review.

Tantilipikorn P, Kirtsreesakul V, Bunnag C, Vangveeravong M, Thanaviratananich S, Chusakul S J Asthma Allergy. 2024; 17:667-679.

PMID: 39045291 PMC: 11264124. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S451733.


House dust mite-related respiratory allergies and probiotics: a narrative review.

Fassio F, Guagnini F Clin Mol Allergy. 2018; 16:15.

PMID: 29946225 PMC: 6006752. DOI: 10.1186/s12948-018-0092-9.


Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Daily Headaches: Is There a Link?.

Gryglas A Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016; 16(4):33.

PMID: 26898685 PMC: 4762930. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-016-0631-z.

References
1.
Shaaban R, Zureik M, Soussan D, Neukirch C, Heinrich J, Sunyer J . Rhinitis and onset of asthma: a longitudinal population-based study. Lancet. 2008; 372(9643):1049-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61446-4. View

2.
Klimek L, Bachert C, Mosges R, Munzel U, Price D, Virchow J . Effectiveness of MP29-02 for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in real-life: results from a noninterventional study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015; 36(1):40-7. DOI: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3823. View

3.
Price D, Shah S, Bhatia S, Bachert C, Berger W, Bousquet J . A new therapy (MP29-02) is effective for the long-term treatment of chronic rhinitis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014; 23(7):495-503. View

4.
Meltzer E, Ratner P, Bachert C, Carr W, Berger W, Canonica G . Clinically relevant effect of a new intranasal therapy (MP29-02) in allergic rhinitis assessed by responder analysis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013; 161(4):369-77. DOI: 10.1159/000351404. View

5.
Lamb C, Ratner P, Johnson C, Ambegaonkar A, Joshi A, Day D . Economic impact of workplace productivity losses due to allergic rhinitis compared with select medical conditions in the United States from an employer perspective. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(6):1203-10. DOI: 10.1185/030079906X112552. View