» Articles » PMID: 22856633

MP29-02 (a Novel Intranasal Formulation of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate) in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Efficacy and Safety

Overview
Date 2012 Aug 4
PMID 22856633
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) have uncontrolled symptoms despite available treatment options. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MP29-02 (a novel intranasal formulation of fluticasone propionate [FP] and azelastine [AZ] hydrochloride), compared with monotherapy with FP, AZ, and placebo sprays for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). This 2-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 779 patients with moderate-to-severe SAR. Treatments were administered 1 spray/nostril twice daily in the same vehicle and delivery device. Daily doses of AZ and FP were 548 and 200 micrograms, respectively. The primary efficacy variable was the 12-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS), consisting of nasal congestion, sneezing, itchy nose, and runny nose. Secondary efficacy variables were (1) 12-hour reflective individual nasal symptom scores; (2) onset of action; (3) 12-hour reflective total ocular symptom score (rTOSS), including itchy eyes, watery eyes, and red eyes; and (4) the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) overall score. MP29-02 significantly reduced the mean rTNSS from baseline by -5.54 points compared with FP (-4.55; p = 0.038), AZ (-4.54; p = 0.032), and placebo (-3.03; p < 0.001), improving the rTNSS by 39% beyond the contribution of FP. All individual nasal symptoms contributed to the efficacy of MP29-02. Onset of action was within 30 minutes. MP29-02 significantly improved rTOSS compared with placebo, provided a clinically important improvement in the overall RQLQ score, and was well tolerated. In this study, MP29-02 provided more complete symptom relief than two widely used first-line AR treatments and was well tolerated.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate nasal spray in treating allergic rhinitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Han X, Wang C, Zhang Q, Guan B, Zhang H, Yu Y Asia Pac Allergy. 2025; 15(1):7-14.

PMID: 40051423 PMC: 11882219. DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000161.


The Use of Azelastine Hydrochloride/Fluticasone Propionate in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Asia: A Review.

Tantilipikorn P, Kirtsreesakul V, Bunnag C, Vangveeravong M, Thanaviratananich S, Chusakul S J Asthma Allergy. 2024; 17:667-679.

PMID: 39045291 PMC: 11264124. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S451733.


A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MP-AzeFlu Nasal Spray in Comparison to Commercially Available Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Sprays in Chinese Volunteers with Allergic Rhinitis.

Zhou B, Cheng L, Pan J, Wang H, Jin Y, Zhao C Pulm Ther. 2023; 9(3):411-427.

PMID: 37580498 PMC: 10447793. DOI: 10.1007/s41030-023-00238-8.


Real-Life Effectiveness of MP-AzeFlu (Dymista) in Swedish Patients with Persistent Allergic Rhinitis, Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale.

Stjarne P, Nguyen D, Kuhl H Pragmat Obs Res. 2023; 14:1-11.

PMID: 36628265 PMC: 9826638. DOI: 10.2147/POR.S375403.


Nasal immune gene expression in response to azelastine and fluticasone propionate combination or monotherapy.

Watts A, West N, Smith P, Zhang P, Cripps A, Cox A Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021; 10(3):e571.

PMID: 34813682 PMC: 8926499. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.571.