» Articles » PMID: 26220127

[Physical Interactions in MRI: Some Rules of Thumb for Their Reduction]

Overview
Journal Radiologe
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Jul 30
PMID 26220127
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most powerful and at the same time gentlest clinical imaging techniques at the present time; however, the enormous physical complexity as well as simple inattentiveness (projectile effect) implicate a significant risk potential and place high demands on the MR operator to ensure a safe workflow. A sound knowledge of the potential MR interactions is the foundation for a safe and profitable operation for all parties.The first part of this article deals with the three most important sources of physical interaction, i.e. static magnetic field, gradient and high-frequency (HF) fields. The paper discusses the differences between each type of field with respect to the impact on human beings, the interactions with magnetic and electrically conducting objects/implants and the relevant safety standards. Each section is followed by simple rules of thumb to minimize potentially unwanted physical MRI interactions.

Citing Articles

A sum-modified-Laplacian and sparse representation based multimodal medical image fusion in Laplacian pyramid domain.

Li X, Zhang X, Ding M Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019; 57(10):2265-2275.

PMID: 31410692 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02023-9.


[MRI-Interactions with magnetically active and electrically conductive material].

Schick F Radiologe. 2019; 59(10):860-868.

PMID: 30874826 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-019-0514-9.

References
1.
Valiron O, Peris L, Rikken G, Schweitzer A, Saoudi Y, Remy C . Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 22(3):334-40. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20398. View

2.
Langman D, Goldberg I, Finn J, Ennis D . Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 Tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(2):426-31. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22463. View

3.
Schenck J . Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12(1):2-19. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<2::aid-jmri2>3.0.co;2-v. View

4.
McRobbie D . Occupational exposure in MRI. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1012):293-312. PMC: 3486652. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/30146162. View

5.
Nitz W, Brinker G, Diehl D, Frese G . Specific absorption rate as a poor indicator of magnetic resonance-related implant heating. Invest Radiol. 2005; 40(12):773-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000185898.59140.91. View