» Articles » PMID: 26151452

Corpus Callosum Area in Patients with Bipolar Disorder with and Without Psychotic Features: an International Multicentre Study

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported MRI abnormalities of the corpus callosum (CC) in patients with bipolar disorder (BD), although only a few studies have directly compared callosal areas in psychotic versus nonpsychotic patients with this disorder. We sought to compare regional callosal areas in a large international multicentre sample of patients with BD and healthy controls.

Methods: We analyzed anatomic T1 MRI data of patients with BD-I and healthy controls recruited from 4 sites (France, Germany, Ireland and the United States). We obtained the mid-sagittal areas of 7 CC subregions using an automatic CC delineation. Differences in regional callosal areas between patients and controls were compared using linear mixed models (adjusting for age, sex, handedness, brain volume, history of alcohol abuse/dependence, lithium or antipsychotic medication status, symptomatic status and site) and multiple comparisons correction. We also compared regional areas of the CC between patients with BD with and without a history of psychotic features.

Results: We included 172 patients and 146 controls in our study. Patients with BD had smaller adjusted mid-sagittal CC areas than controls along the posterior body, the isthmus and the splenium of the CC. Patients with a positive history of psychotic features had greater adjusted area of the rostral CC region than those without a history of psychotic features.

Limitations: We found small to medium effect sizes, and there was no calibration technique among the sites.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that BD with psychosis is associated with a different pattern of interhemispheric connectivity than BD without psychosis and could be considered a relevant neuroimaging subtype of BD.

Citing Articles

Distinguished Frontal White Matter Abnormalities Between Psychotic and Nonpsychotic Bipolar Disorders in a Pilot Study.

Shiroyama T, Maeda M, Tanii H, Motomura E, Okada M Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002441 PMC: 11853555. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020108.


Deriving Mendelian Randomization-based Causal Networks of Brain Imaging Phenotypes and Bipolar Disorder.

OConnell S, Brown B, Cannon D, Broin P, Knowles D, Parker N medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39711695 PMC: 11661354. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.12.24318953.


The Genetic Architecture of the Human Corpus Callosum and its Subregions.

Bhatt R, Gadewar S, Shetty A, Ba Gari I, Haddad E, Javid S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39091796 PMC: 11291056. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.22.603147.


CUT homeobox genes: transcriptional regulation of neuronal specification and beyond.

Leyva-Diaz E Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1233830.

PMID: 37744879 PMC: 10515288. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1233830.


A morphological study of the shape of the corpus callosum in normal, schizophrenic and bipolar patients.

Vermeulen C, du Toit P, Venter G, Human-Baron R J Anat. 2022; 242(2):153-163.

PMID: 36226749 PMC: 9877476. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13777.


References
1.
Bachman A, Lee S, Sidtis J, Ardekani B . Corpus callosum shape and size changes in early Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal MRI study using the OASIS brain database. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013; 39(1):71-8. PMC: 4314946. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-131526. View

2.
Bora E, Vahip S, Akdeniz F, Gonul A, Eryavuz A, Ogut M . The effect of previous psychotic mood episodes on cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar patients. Bipolar Disord. 2007; 9(5):468-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00469.x. View

3.
Jenkinson M, Beckmann C, Behrens T, Woolrich M, Smith S . FSL. Neuroimage. 2011; 62(2):782-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015. View

4.
Ardekani B, Bachman A, Figarsky K, Sidtis J . Corpus callosum shape changes in early Alzheimer's disease: an MRI study using the OASIS brain database. Brain Struct Funct. 2013; 219(1):343-52. PMC: 3657596. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-013-0503-0. View

5.
Button K, Ioannidis J, Mokrysz C, Nosek B, Flint J, Robinson E . Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3475. View