» Articles » PMID: 26103164

Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Hypertrophic and Pseudo-Hypertrophic Changes in Lower Leg Muscles of Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Their Relationship to Functional Measurements

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jun 24
PMID 26103164
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate contractile and non-contractile content of lower leg muscles of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and determine the relationships between non-contractile content and functional abilities.

Methods: Lower leg muscles of thirty-two boys with DMD and sixteen age matched unaffected controls were imaged. Non-contractile content, contractile cross sectional area and non-contractile cross sectional area of lower leg muscles (tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, peroneal, medial gastrocnemius and soleus) were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Muscle strength, timed functional tests and the Brooke lower extremity score were also assessed.

Results: Non-contractile content of lower leg muscles (peroneal, medial gastrocnemius, and soleus) was significantly greater than control group (p<0.05). Non-contractile content of lower leg muscles correlated with Brooke score (rs = 0.64-0.84) and 30 feet walk (rs = 0.66-0.80). Dorsiflexor (DF) and plantarflexor (PF) specific torque was significantly different between the groups.

Discussion: Overall, non-contractile content of the lower leg muscles was greater in DMD than controls. Furthermore, there was an age dependent increase in contractile content in the medial gastrocnemius of boys with DMD. The findings of this study suggest that T1 weighted MR images can be used to monitor disease progression and provide a quantitative estimate of contractile and non-contractile content of tissue in children with DMD.

Citing Articles

Acute microtubule changes linked to DMD pathology are insufficient to impair contractile function or enhance contraction-induced injury in healthy muscle.

Vanegas C, Ursitti J, Kallenbach J, Pinto K, Harriot A, Coleman A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38948772 PMC: 11212994. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.19.599775.


Draft Guidance for Industry Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Becker Muscular Dystrophy, and Related Dystrophinopathies - Developing Potential Treatments for the Entire Spectrum of Disease.

McDonald C, Camino E, Escandon R, Finkel R, Fischer R, Flanigan K J Neuromuscul Dis. 2024; 11(2):499-523.

PMID: 38363616 PMC: 10977441. DOI: 10.3233/JND-230219.


Multivariate modeling of magnetic resonance biomarkers and clinical outcome measures for Duchenne muscular dystrophy clinical trials.

Kim S, Willcocks R, Daniels M, Morales J, Yoon D, Triplett W CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023; 12(10):1437-1449.

PMID: 37534782 PMC: 10583249. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13021.


Eccentric contraction-induced strength loss in dystrophin-deficient muscle: Preparations, protocols, and mechanisms.

Kiriaev L, Baumann C, Lindsay A J Gen Physiol. 2023; 155(2).

PMID: 36651896 PMC: 9856740. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.202213208.


Step Activity Monitoring in Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and its Correlation with Magnetic Resonance Measures and Functional Performance.

Nair K, Lott D, Forbes S, Barnard A, Willcocks R, Senesac C J Neuromuscul Dis. 2022; 9(3):423-436.

PMID: 35466946 PMC: 9257666. DOI: 10.3233/JND-210746.


References
1.
Sled J, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(1):87-97. DOI: 10.1109/42.668698. View

2.
Beenakker E, de Vries J, Fock J, van Tol M, Brouwer O, Maurits N . Quantitative assessment of calf circumference in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2002; 12(7-8):639-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8966(02)00019-6. View

3.
Shah P, Stevens J, Gregory C, Pathare N, Jayaraman A, Bickel S . Lower-extremity muscle cross-sectional area after incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(6):772-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.028. View

4.
Sampaolesi M, Blot S, DAntona G, Granger N, Tonlorenzi R, Innocenzi A . Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature. 2006; 444(7119):574-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature05282. View

5.
Deconinck N, Dan B . Pathophysiology of duchenne muscular dystrophy: current hypotheses. Pediatr Neurol. 2006; 36(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2006.09.016. View