Topological Polymorphism of the Two-start Chromatin Fiber

Overview

Journal Biophys J

Publisher Cell Press

Specialty Biophysics

Date 2015 May 21

PMID 25992737

Citations 31

Authors

Davood Norouzi

Victor B Zhurkin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Specific details concerning the spatial organization of nucleosomes in 30 nm fibers remain unknown. To investigate this, we analyzed all stereochemically possible configurations of two-start nucleosome fibers with short DNA linkers L = 13-37 bp (nucleosome repeat length (NRL) = 160-184 bp). Four superhelical parameters-inclination of nucleosomes, twist, rise, and diameter-uniquely describe a regular symmetric fiber. The energy of a fiber is defined as the sum of four terms: elastic energy of the linker DNA, steric repulsion, electrostatics, and a phenomenological (H4 tail-acidic patch) interaction between two stacked nucleosomes. By optimizing the fiber energy with respect to the superhelical parameters, we found two types of topological transition in fibers (associated with the change in inclination angle): one caused by an abrupt 360° change in the linker DNA twisting (change in the DNA linking number, ΔLk = 1), and another caused by overcrossing of the linkers (ΔLk = 2). To the best of our knowledge, this topological polymorphism of the two-start fibers was not reported in the computations published earlier. Importantly, the optimal configurations of the fibers with linkers L = 10n and 10n + 5 bp are characterized by different values of the DNA linking number-that is, they are topologically different. Our results are consistent with experimental observations, such as the inclination 60° to 70° (the angle between the nucleosomal disks and the fiber axis), helical rise, diameter, and left-handedness of the fibers. In addition, we make several testable predictions, among them different degrees of DNA supercoiling in fibers with L = 10n and 10n + 5 bp, different flexibility of the two types of fibers, and a correlation between the local NRL and the level of transcription in different parts of the yeast genome.

Citing Articles

Nucleosome Spacing Can Fine-Tune Higher Order Chromatin Assembly.

Chen L, Maristany M, Farr S, Luo J, Gibson B, Doolittle L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763792 PMC: 11703229. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.23.627571.

Geometric variations in nucleosomal DNA dictate higher-order chromatin structure and enhancer-promoter communication.

Todolli S, Nizovtseva E, Clauvelin N, Maxian O, Studitsky V, Olson W J Chem Phys. 2024; 161(24).

PMID: 39727280 PMC: 11681976. DOI: 10.1063/5.0240991.

Local volume concentration, packing domains, and scaling properties of chromatin.

Carignano M, Kroeger M, Almassalha L, Agrawal V, Li W, Pujadas-Liwag E Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39331520 PMC: 11434620. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97604.

Determining mesoscale chromatin structure parameters from spatially correlated cleavage data using a coarse-grained oligonucleosome model.

Clerkin A, Pagane N, West D, Spakowitz A, Risca V bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131347 PMC: 11312488. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.28.605011.

Local Volume Concentration, Packing Domains and Scaling Properties of Chromatin.

Carignano M, Kroger M, Almassalha L, Agrawal V, Li W, Pujadas-Liwag E ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38495560 PMC: 10942481.

References

Grigoryev S, Ioffe L . The dependence of the linking number of a circular minichromosome upon the shape and the orientation of its nucleosomes. FEBS Lett. 1981; 130(1):43-6. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80661-8. View

Norton V, Imai B, Yau P, Bradbury E . Histone acetylation reduces nucleosome core particle linking number change. Cell. 1989; 57(3):449-57. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90920-3. View

Perisic O, Collepardo-Guevara R, Schlick T . Modeling studies of chromatin fiber structure as a function of DNA linker length. J Mol Biol. 2010; 403(5):777-802. PMC: 2966533. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.057. View

Robinson P, Fairall L, Huynh V, Rhodes D . EM measurements define the dimensions of the "30-nm" chromatin fiber: evidence for a compact, interdigitated structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(17):6506-11. PMC: 1436021. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601212103. View

Luger K, Dechassa M, Tremethick D . New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: an ordered state or a disordered affair?. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012; 13(7):436-47. PMC: 3408961. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3382. View

Cole H, Howard B, Clark D . The centromeric nucleosome of budding yeast is perfectly positioned and covers the entire centromere. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(31):12687-92. PMC: 3150906. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104978108. View

Strauss F, PRUNELL A . Organization of internucleosomal DNA in rat liver chromatin. EMBO J. 1983; 2(1):51-6. PMC: 555085. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01379.x. View

WORCEL A, Strogatz S, Riley D . Structure of chromatin and the linking number of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981; 78(3):1461-5. PMC: 319150. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1461. View

Tolstorukov M, Colasanti A, McCandlish D, Olson W, Zhurkin V . A novel roll-and-slide mechanism of DNA folding in chromatin: implications for nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol. 2007; 371(3):725-38. PMC: 2000845. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.048. View

10.

Bauer W . Structure and reactions of closed duplex DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978; 7:287-313. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.001443. View

11.

Kulaeva O, Zheng G, Polikanov Y, Colasanti A, Clauvelin N, Mukhopadhyay S . Internucleosomal interactions mediated by histone tails allow distant communication in chromatin. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(24):20248-57. PMC: 3370207. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.333104. View

12.

Scipioni A, Turchetti G, Morosetti S, De Santis P . Geometrical, conformational and topological restraints in regular nucleosome compaction in chromatin. Biophys Chem. 2010; 148(1-3):56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.010. View

13.

Woodcock C, Grigoryev S, Horowitz R, Whitaker N . A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(19):9021-5. PMC: 47493. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9021. View

14.

Routh A, Sandin S, Rhodes D . Nucleosome repeat length and linker histone stoichiometry determine chromatin fiber structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(26):8872-7. PMC: 2440727. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802336105. View

15.

Simpson R, Thoma F, Brubaker J . Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985; 42(3):799-808. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90276-4. View

16.

Wedemann G, Langowski J . Computer simulation of the 30-nanometer chromatin fiber. Biophys J. 2002; 82(6):2847-59. PMC: 1302074. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75627-0. View

17.

Nam G, Arya G . Torsional behavior of chromatin is modulated by rotational phasing of nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(15):9691-9. PMC: 4150795. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku694. View

18.

Schiessel H, Widom J, Bruinsma R, Gelbart W . Polymer reptation and nucleosome repositioning. Phys Rev Lett. 2001; 86(19):4414-7. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4414. View

19.

Pettersen E, Goddard T, Huang C, Couch G, Greenblatt D, Meng E . UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25(13):1605-12. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20084. View

20.

van Holde K, Zlatanova J . Chromatin fiber structure: Where is the problem now?. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007; 18(5):651-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.08.005. View