» Articles » PMID: 17585938

A Novel Roll-and-slide Mechanism of DNA Folding in Chromatin: Implications for Nucleosome Positioning

Overview
Journal J Mol Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Jun 26
PMID 17585938
Citations 108
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How eukaryotic genomes encode the folding of DNA into nucleosomes and how this intrinsic organization of chromatin guides biological function are questions of wide interest. The physical basis of nucleosome positioning lies in the sequence-dependent propensity of DNA to adopt the tightly bent configuration imposed by the binding of the histone proteins. Traditionally, only DNA bending and twisting deformations are considered, while the effects of the lateral displacements of adjacent base pairs are neglected. We demonstrate, however, that these displacements have a much more important structural role than ever imagined. Specifically, the lateral Slide deformations observed at sites of local anisotropic bending of DNA define its superhelical trajectory in chromatin. Furthermore, the computed cost of deforming DNA on the nucleosome is sequence-specific: in optimally positioned sequences the most easily deformed base-pair steps (CA:TG and TA) occur at sites of large positive Slide and negative Roll (where the DNA bends into the minor groove). These conclusions rest upon a treatment of DNA that goes beyond the conventional ribbon model, incorporating all essential degrees of freedom of "real" duplexes in the estimation of DNA deformation energies. Indeed, only after lateral Slide displacements are considered are we able to account for the sequence-specific folding of DNA found in nucleosome structures. The close correspondence between the predicted and observed nucleosome locations demonstrates the potential advantage of our "structural" approach in the computer mapping of nucleosome positioning.

Citing Articles

Histone N-tails modulate sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes.

Nikitina T, Guiblet W, Cui F, Zhurkin V J Biol Chem. 2024; 301(2):108138.

PMID: 39732170 PMC: 11803869. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108138.


The nucleosome reference frame and standard geometries for octasomes.

Sun R, Bishop T Biophys Rev. 2024; 16(3):315-330.

PMID: 39099844 PMC: 11297230. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-024-01206-5.


Interpretable deep residual network uncovers nucleosome positioning and associated features.

Masoudi-Sobhanzadeh Y, Li S, Peng Y, Panchenko A Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(15):8734-8745.

PMID: 39036965 PMC: 11347144. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae623.


Sequence Dependence in Nucleosome Dynamics.

Khatua P, Tang P, Ghosh Moulick A, Patel R, Manandhar A, Loverde S J Phys Chem B. 2024; 128(13):3090-3101.

PMID: 38530903 PMC: 11181342. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07363.


DNA Sequence-Dependent Properties of Nucleosome Positioning in Regions of Distinct Chromatin States in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.

Liu G, Zhang Z, Dong B, Liu J Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(22).

PMID: 36430966 PMC: 9693356. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214488.


References
1.
Luger K, Mader A, Richmond R, Sargent D, Richmond T . Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997; 389(6648):251-60. DOI: 10.1038/38444. View

2.
Flaus A, Owen-Hughes T . Mechanisms for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling: farewell to the tuna-can octamer?. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004; 14(2):165-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.01.007. View

3.
Harp J, Hanson B, Timm D, Bunick G . Asymmetries in the nucleosome core particle at 2.5 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2000; 56(Pt 12):1513-34. DOI: 10.1107/s0907444900011847. View

4.
Satchwell S, Drew H, Travers A . Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986; 191(4):659-75. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90452-3. View

5.
Kosikov K, Gorin A, Zhurkin V, Olson W . DNA stretching and compression: large-scale simulations of double helical structures. J Mol Biol. 1999; 289(5):1301-26. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2798. View