» Articles » PMID: 25930165

Lineage-specific Sequence Evolution and Exon Edge Conservation Partially Explain the Relationship Between Evolutionary Rate and Expression Level in A. thaliana

Overview
Journal Mol Ecol
Date 2015 May 2
PMID 25930165
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapidly evolving proteins can aid the identification of genes underlying phenotypic adaptation across taxa, but functional and structural elements of genes can also affect evolutionary rates. In plants, the 'edges' of exons, flanking intron junctions, are known to contain splice enhancers and to have a higher degree of conservation compared to the remainder of the coding region. However, the extent to which these regions may be masking indicators of positive selection or account for the relationship between dN/dS and other genomic parameters is unclear. We investigate the effects of exon edge conservation on the relationship of dN/dS to various sequence characteristics and gene expression parameters in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We also obtain lineage-specific dN/dS estimates, making use of the recently sequenced genome of Thellungiella parvula, the second closest sequenced relative after the sister species Arabidopsis lyrata. Overall, we find that the effect of exon edge conservation, as well as the use of lineage-specific substitution estimates, upon dN/dS ratios partly explains the relationship between the rates of protein evolution and expression level. Furthermore, the removal of exon edges shifts dN/dS estimates upwards, increasing the proportion of genes potentially under adaptive selection. We conclude that lineage-specific substitutions and exon edge conservation have an important effect on dN/dS ratios and should be considered when assessing their relationship with other genomic parameters.

Citing Articles

Asymmetric Evolution of Protein Domains in the Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor-Like Kinase Family of Plant Signaling Proteins.

Man J, Harrington T, Lally K, Bartlett M Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(10).

PMID: 37787619 PMC: 10588794. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad220.


Weaker selection on genes with treatment-specific expression consistent with a limit on plasticity evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Roberts M, Josephs E Genetics. 2023; 224(2).

PMID: 37094602 PMC: 10484170. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad074.


Robust and rigorous identification of tissue-specific genes by statistically extending tau score.

Luleci H, Yilmaz A BioData Min. 2022; 15(1):31.

PMID: 36494766 PMC: 9733102. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-022-00315-9.


Contrasting gene-level signatures of selection with reproductive fitness.

Bush S, Murren C, Urrutia A, Kover P Mol Ecol. 2021; 31(5):1515-1526.

PMID: 34918851 PMC: 9304172. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16329.


Tracing the Evolutionary History of the CAP Superfamily of Proteins Using Amino Acid Sequence Homology and Conservation of Splice Sites.

Abraham A, Chandler D J Mol Evol. 2017; 85(3-4):137-157.

PMID: 29071358 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-017-9813-9.


References
1.
Akashi H, Eyre-Walker A . Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999; 8(6):688-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80038-5. View

2.
Szovenyi P, Devos N, Weston D, Yang X, Hock Z, Shaw J . Efficient purging of deleterious mutations in plants with haploid selfing. Genome Biol Evol. 2014; 6(5):1238-52. PMC: 4041004. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu099. View

3.
Eisenberg E, Levanon E . Human housekeeping genes are compact. Trends Genet. 2003; 19(7):362-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00140-9. View

4.
Cherry J . Expression level, evolutionary rate, and the cost of expression. Genome Biol Evol. 2010; 2:757-69. PMC: 2979011. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evq059. View

5.
Cheadle C, Vawter M, Freed W, Becker K . Analysis of microarray data using Z score transformation. J Mol Diagn. 2003; 5(2):73-81. PMC: 1907322. DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60455-2. View