» Articles » PMID: 25912929

Everolimus and Sirolimus in Transplantation-related but Different

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2015 Apr 28
PMID 25912929
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) sirolimus and everolimus are used not only as immunosuppressants after organ transplantation in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) but also as proliferation signal inhibitors coated on drug-eluting stents and in cancer therapy. Notwithstanding their related chemical structures, both have distinct pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicodynamic properties.

Areas Covered: The additional hydroxyethyl group at the C(40) of the everolimus molecule results in different tissue and subcellular distribution, different affinities to active drug transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes as well as differences in drug-target protein interactions including a much higher potency in terms of interacting with the mTOR complex 2 than sirolimus. Said mechanistic differences as well as differences found in clinical trials in transplant patients are reviewed.

Expert Opinion: In comparison to sirolimus, everolimus has higher bioavailability, a shorter terminal half-life, different blood metabolite patterns, the potential to antagonize the negative effects of CNIs on neuronal and kidney cell metabolism (which sirolimus enhances), the ability to stimulate mitochondrial oxidation (which sirolimus inhibits) and to reduce vascular inflammation to a greater extent. A head-to-head, randomized trial comparing the safety and tolerability of these two mTOR inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients is merited.

Citing Articles

Inhibitory effects of the combination of rapamycin with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel on the growth of pancreatic cancer tumors.

Jobu Y, Nishigawa M, Furihata K, Furihata M, Uchida K, Taniuchi K Hum Cell. 2025; 38(2):44.

PMID: 39794664 PMC: 11723851. DOI: 10.1007/s13577-024-01165-9.


Targeting T helper 17 cells: emerging strategies for overcoming transplant rejection.

Lee Y, Cho M Clin Transplant Res. 2025; 38(4):309-325.

PMID: 39743231 PMC: 11732763. DOI: 10.4285/ctr.24.0058.


A single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly sirolimus (rapamycin) on muscle strength and endurance in older adults following a 13-week exercise program.

Stanfield B, Kaeberlein M, Leroux B, Jones J, Lucas R, Arroll B Trials. 2024; 25(1):642.

PMID: 39354527 PMC: 11443903. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08490-2.


Pharmacology of Aging: as a Tool to Validate Drug Targets for Healthy Lifespan.

Dos Santos E, Cocheme H Aging Biol. 2024; 2(1):20240034.

PMID: 39346601 PMC: 7616647. DOI: 10.59368/agingbio.20240034.


Stepwise Incremental Dose Schedule of Sirolimus Is Successfully Tolerated by a Patient With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Who Was Initially Allergic to mTOR Inhibitors.

Seyama K, Komiyama E, Tsuchihashi H, Okura M, Sekimoto Y, Mitsuishi Y Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58805.

PMID: 38784348 PMC: 11112535. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58805.


References
1.
Park K, Kang S, Velders M, Shin D, Hahn S, Lim W . Safety and efficacy of everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2013; 165(2):241-50.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.007. View

2.
Sehgal S, Ocain T, Weichman B . Rapamycin: a novel immunosuppressive macrolide. Med Res Rev. 1994; 14(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1002/med.2610140102. View

3.
Billing H, Burmeister G, Plotnicki L, Ahlenstiel T, Fichtner A, Sander A . Longitudinal growth on an everolimus- versus an MMF-based steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen in paediatric renal transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 2013; 26(9):903-9. DOI: 10.1111/tri.12148. View

4.
Lee S, Coco M, Greenstein S, Schechner R, Tellis V, Glicklich D . The effect of sirolimus on sex hormone levels of male renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2005; 19(2):162-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00257.x. View

5.
SCHULER W, Sedrani R, Cottens S, Haberlin B, Schulz M, Schuurman H . SDZ RAD, a new rapamycin derivative: pharmacological properties in vitro and in vivo. Transplantation. 1997; 64(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199707150-00008. View