» Articles » PMID: 25835512

Pilot Study on the Bioactivity of Vitamin D in the Skin After Oral Supplementation

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Apr 4
PMID 25835512
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laboratory studies suggest that vitamin D (VD) supplementation inhibits skin carcinogenesis. However, epidemiologic studies report mixed findings in the association between circulating VD levels and skin cancer risk. We conducted a clinical study to determine whether oral cholecalciferol supplementation would exert direct bioactivity in human skin through modulation of the VD receptor (VDR). We enrolled 25 individuals with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D levels <30 ng/mL and with skin photodamage to take 50,000 IU of cholecalciferol biweekly for 8 to 9 weeks. Then, we obtained baseline and end-of-study skin biopsies from photodamaged (PD) and photoprotected (PP) skin, and from benign nevi (BN) and tested for mRNA expression of VDR and cytochrome P450-24 (CYP24), and markers of keratinocytic differentiation. High-dose cholecalciferol supplementation significantly elevated circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D (P < 0.0001) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D (P < 0.0001). VDR expression in PD- and PP-skin showed minimum changes after supplementation. CYP24 expression in PD- and PP-skin was increased after supplementation by 186%, P = 0.08, and 134%, P = 0.07, respectively. In BNs from 11 participants, a trend for higher VDR and CYP24 expression was observed (average of 20%, P = 0.08, and 544%, P = 0.09, respectively). Caspase-14 expression at the basal layer in PD skin samples was the only epidermal differentiation marker that was significantly increased (49%, P < 0.0001). High-dose cholecalciferol supplementation raised serum VD metabolite levels concurrently with CYP24 mRNA and caspase-14 levels in the skin. Our findings of significant variability in the range of VDR and CYP24 expression across study samples represent an important consideration in studies evaluating the role of VD as a skin cancer chemopreventive agent.

Citing Articles

Unconventional Remedies for Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Journey into Alternative Treatments.

Deng E, Khachemoune A Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2024; 25(16):2047-2059.

PMID: 38347792 DOI: 10.2174/0113892010286715240119061108.


Modulatory role of vitamins A, B3, C, D, and E on skin health, immunity, microbiome, and diseases.

Joshi M, Hiremath P, John J, Ranadive N, Nandakumar K, Mudgal J Pharmacol Rep. 2023; 75(5):1096-1114.

PMID: 37673852 PMC: 10539462. DOI: 10.1007/s43440-023-00520-1.


Recent Advances in Clinical Research for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention.

Tow R, Hanoun S, Andresen B, Shahid A, Wang J, Kelly K Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568635 PMC: 10417305. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153819.


Chemoprevention agents for melanoma: A path forward into phase 3 clinical trials.

Jeter J, Bowles T, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Swetter S, Filipp F, Abdel-Malek Z Cancer. 2018; 125(1):18-44.

PMID: 30281145 PMC: 6860362. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31719.


Relationship between Vitamin D Status and Striae Distensae: A Case-Referent Study.

Zanella R, Valente D, Doncatto L, Santos Rossi D, Grimaldi Lerias A, Padoin A Dermatol Res Pract. 2015; 2015:640482.

PMID: 26635874 PMC: 4655264. DOI: 10.1155/2015/640482.

References
1.
Blum A, Rassner G, Garbe C . Modified ABC-point list of dermoscopy: A simplified and highly accurate dermoscopic algorithm for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 48(5):672-8. DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2003.282. View

2.
Berwick M, Erdei E . Vitamin D and melanoma incidence and mortality. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012; 26(1):9-15. PMC: 3734794. DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12015. View

3.
Dowd D, MacDonald P . The 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-independent actions of the vitamin D receptor in skin. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 121(1-2):317-21. PMC: 4127032. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.072. View

4.
Bikle D, Chang S, Crumrine D, Elalieh H, Man M, Dardenne O . Mice lacking 25OHD 1alpha-hydroxylase demonstrate decreased epidermal differentiation and barrier function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004; 89-90(1-5):347-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.113. View

5.
Armas L, Hollis B, Heaney R . Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89(11):5387-91. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-0360. View