Rethinking the Role of Sham TMS

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2015 Mar 14

PMID 25767458

Citations 89

Authors

Felix Duecker

Alexander T Sack

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approaches are widely used in basic and clinical research to ensure that observed effects are due to the intended neural manipulation instead of being caused by various possible side effects. We here critically discuss several methodological aspects of sham TMS. Importantly, we propose to carefully distinguish between the placebo versus sensory side effects of TMS. In line with this conceptual distinction, we describe current limitations of sham TMS approaches in the context of placebo effects and blinding success, followed by a short review of our own work demonstrating that the sensory side effects of sham TMS are not unspecific as often falsely assumed. Lastly, we argue that sham TMS approaches are inherently insufficient as full-fledged control conditions as they fail to demonstrate the specificity of TMS effects to a particular brain area or time point of stimulation. Sham TMS should therefore only complement alternative control strategies in TMS research.

Citing Articles

Effects of parietal iTBS on resting-state effective connectivity within the frontoparietal network in patients with schizophrenia: An fMRI study.

Li L, Wang L, Wu H, Li B, Pan W, Jin W Neuroimage Clin. 2024; 45:103715.

PMID: 39608227 PMC: 11638604. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103715.

Online transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals dynamic interactions between language control and processing in bilingual language production.

Wu J, Ji Y, Cai C, Pu X, Wang Q, Yan G Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(11).

PMID: 39604075 PMC: 11602258. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae452.

Preliminary findings of a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: a analysis on the role of co-occurring personality disorders.

Maciaszek J, Rymaszewska J, Wieczorek T, Piotrowski P, Szczesniak D, Beszlej J Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1363984.

PMID: 39588550 PMC: 11586332. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1363984.

Adaptation and exogenous attention interact in the early visual cortex: A TMS study.

Lee H, Fernandez A, Carrasco M iScience. 2024; 27(11):111155.

PMID: 39524352 PMC: 11544076. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111155.

Meta-learning of human motor adaptation via the dorsal premotor cortex.

Sugiyama T, Uehara S, Izawa J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(44):e2417543121.

PMID: 39441634 PMC: 11536165. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2417543121.

References

Counter S, Borg E . Analysis of the coil generated impulse noise in extracranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 85(4):280-8. DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90117-t. View

Segev A, Bloch Y . A bit of shame and a proud sham. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(4):703-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.11.002. View

Broadbent H, Van Den Eynde F, Guillaume S, Hanif E, Stahl D, David A . Blinding success of rTMS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in randomised sham-controlled trials: a systematic review. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 12(4):240-8. DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2010.541281. View

Duecker F, Sack A . Pre-stimulus sham TMS facilitates target detection. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e57765. PMC: 3587629. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057765. View

Lisanby S, GUTMAN D, Luber B, Schroeder C, Sackeim H . Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials. Biol Psychiatry. 2001; 49(5):460-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01110-0. View

Jelic M, Stevanovic V, Milanovic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Filipovic S . Transcranial magnetic stimulation has no placebo effect on motor learning. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013; 124(8):1646-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.024. View

Thielscher A, Opitz A, Windhoff M . Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(1):234-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.061. View

Brunoni A, Lopes M, Kaptchuk T, Fregni F . Placebo response of non-pharmacological and pharmacological trials in major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009; 4(3):e4824. PMC: 2653635. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004824. View

Bae E, Theodore W, Fregni F, Cantello R, Pascual-Leone A, Rotenberg A . An estimate of placebo effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2011; 20(2):355-9. PMC: 3059584. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.005. View

10.

Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V, Rothwell J . Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience--virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001; 10(2):232-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7. View

11.

Rossi S, Ferro M, Cincotta M, Ulivelli M, Bartalini S, Miniussi C . A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 118(3):709-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.005. View

12.

Duecker F, de Graaf T, Jacobs C, Sack A . Time- and task-dependent non-neural effects of real and sham TMS. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e73813. PMC: 3763998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073813. View

13.

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini P, Pascual-Leone A . Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(12):2008-2039. PMC: 3260536. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. View

14.

Dhamne S, Kothare R, Yu C, Hsieh T, Anastasio E, Oberman L . A measure of acoustic noise generated from transcranial magnetic stimulation coils. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):432-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.056. View

15.

Berlim M, Broadbent H, Van Den Eynde F . Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013; 16(5):1173-81. DOI: 10.1017/S1461145712001691. View

16.

Borckardt J, Walker J, Branham R, Rydin-Gray S, Hunter C, Beeson H . Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system. Brain Stimul. 2009; 1(1):52-9. PMC: 2677803. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2007.09.003. View

17.

Walsh V, Cowey A . Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 1(1):73-9. DOI: 10.1038/35036239. View

18.

Mansur C, Myczkowki M, de Barros Cabral S, Sartorelli M, Boura Bellini B, Machado Dias A . Placebo effect after prefrontal magnetic stimulation in the treatment of resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011; 14(10):1389-97. DOI: 10.1017/S1461145711000575. View

19.

Okabe S, Ugawa Y, Kanazawa I . 0.2-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has no add-on effects as compared to a realistic sham stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2003; 18(4):382-8. DOI: 10.1002/mds.10370. View

20.

Arana A, Borckardt J, Ricci R, Anderson B, Li X, Linder K . Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?. Brain Stimul. 2009; 1(1):44-51. PMC: 2678025. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.006. View