» Articles » PMID: 20682353

Impact of the Gyral Geometry on the Electric Field Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2010 Aug 5
PMID 20682353
Citations 132
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spatial extent of the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on neural tissue is only coarsely understood. One key problem is the realistic calculation of the electric field induced in the brain, which proves difficult due to the complex gyral folding pattern that results in an inhomogeneous conductivity distribution within the skull. We used the finite element method (FEM) together with a high-resolution volume mesh of the human head to better characterize the field induced in cortical gray matter (GM). The volume mesh was constructed from T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance images to allow for an anatomically accurate modeling of the gyrification pattern. Five tissue types were taken into account, corresponding to skin, skull, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) including the ventricles as well as cortical gray and white matter. We characterized the effect of the current direction on the electric field distribution in GM. Importantly, the field strength in GM was increased by up to 51% when the induced currents were perpendicular to the local gyrus orientation. This effect was mainly restricted to the gyral crowns and lips, but did not extend into the sulcal walls. As a result, the focality of the fields induced in GM was increased. This enhancement effect might in part underlie the dependency of stimulation thresholds on coil orientation, as commonly observed in TMS motor cortex studies. In contrast to the clear-cut effects of the gyrification pattern on the induced field strength, current directions were predominantly influenced by the CSF-skull boundary.

Citing Articles

Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression: A comprehensive update endorsed by the National Network of Depression Centers, the Clinical TMS Society, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Trapp N, Purgianto A, Taylor J, Singh M, Oberman L, Mickey B Clin Neurophysiol. 2025; 170:206-233.

PMID: 39756350 PMC: 11825283. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.015.


Dissecting the Causal Role of Early Inferior Frontal Activation in Reading.

Uno T, Takano K, Nakamura K J Neurosci. 2024; 45(2.

PMID: 39542729 PMC: 11713856. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0194-24.2024.


A comparative study of simulated electric fields of transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting different cortical motor regions.

Jiaqi Zhang J, Zhang B, Bai Z, Fong K Bioelectromagnetics. 2024; 46(1):e22523.

PMID: 39279429 PMC: 11650412. DOI: 10.1002/bem.22523.


The right posterior parietal cortex mediates spatial reorienting of attentional choice bias.

Sengupta A, Banerjee S, Ganesh S, Grover S, Sridharan D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6938.

PMID: 39138185 PMC: 11322534. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51283-z.


Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.

Wang B, Peterchev A, Gaugain G, Ilmoniemi R, Grill W, Bikson M J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(4).

PMID: 38994790 PMC: 11370654. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad625e.