» Articles » PMID: 37982031

Network-specific Metabolic and Haemodynamic Effects Elicited by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation

Overview
Journal Nat Ment Health
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Nov 20
PMID 37982031
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), when applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), treats depression. Therapeutic effects are hypothesized to arise from propagation of local dlPFC stimulation effects across distributed networks; however, the mechanisms of this remain unresolved. dlPFC contains representations of different networks. As such, dlPFC TMS may exert different effects depending on the network being stimulated. Here, to test this, we applied high-frequency TMS to two nearby dlPFC targets functionally embedded in distinct anti-correlated networks-the default and salience networks- in the same individuals in separate sessions. Local and distributed TMS effects were measured with combined fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Identical TMS patterns caused opposing effects on local glucose metabolism: metabolism increased at the salience target following salience TMS but decreased at the default target following default TMS. At the distributed level, both conditions increased functional connectivity between the default and salience networks, with this effect being dramatically larger following default TMS. Metabolic and haemodynamic effects were also linked: across subjects, the magnitude of local metabolic changes correlated with the degree of functional connectivity changes. These results suggest that TMS effects upon dlPFC are network specific. They also invoke putative antidepressant mechanisms of TMS: network de-coupling.

Citing Articles

Lateral prefrontal theta oscillations causally drive a computational mechanism underlying conflict expectation and adaptation.

Martinez-Molina M, Valdebenito-Oyarzo G, Soto-Icaza P, Zamorano F, Figueroa-Vargas A, Carvajal-Paredes P Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9858.

PMID: 39543128 PMC: 11564697. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54244-8.


Lateral prefrontal cortex controls interplay between working memory and actions.

Kiyonaga A, Miller J, DEsposito M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345454 PMC: 11429898. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.17.613601.


Precision Network Modeling of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Across Individuals Suggests Therapeutic Targets and Potential for Improvement.

Sun W, Billot A, Du J, Wei X, Lemley R, Daneshzand M medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39185539 PMC: 11343249. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.15.24311994.

References
1.
Kito S, Hasegawa T, Koga Y . Neuroanatomical correlates of therapeutic efficacy of low-frequency right prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011; 65(2):175-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02183.x. View

2.
Cole E, Phillips A, Bentzley B, Stimpson K, Nejad R, Barmak F . Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2021; 179(2):132-141. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. View

3.
van den Heuvel M, Scholtens L, Turk E, Mantini D, Vanduffel W, Barrett L . Multimodal analysis of cortical chemoarchitecture and macroscale fMRI resting-state functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016; 37(9):3103-13. PMC: 5111767. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23229. View

4.
Hacker C, Snyder A, Pahwa M, Corbetta M, Leuthardt E . Frequency-specific electrophysiologic correlates of resting state fMRI networks. Neuroimage. 2017; 149:446-457. PMC: 5745814. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.054. View

5.
Uddin L . Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 16(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3857. View