» Articles » PMID: 25759427

Targeting Accuracy of Image-Guided Radiosurgery for Intracranial Lesions: A Comparison Across Multiple Linear Accelerator Platforms

Overview
Date 2015 Mar 12
PMID 25759427
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the overall positioning accuracy of image-guided intracranial radiosurgery across multiple linear accelerator platforms.

Methods: A computed tomography scan with a slice thickness of 1.0 mm was acquired of an anthropomorphic head phantom in a BrainLAB U-frame mask. The phantom was embedded with three 5-mm diameter tungsten ball bearings, simulating a central, a left, and an anterior cranial lesion. The ball bearings were positioned to radiation isocenter under ExacTrac X-ray or cone-beam computed tomography image guidance on 3 Linacs: (1) ExacTrac X-ray localization on a Novalis Tx; (2) cone-beam computed tomography localization on the Novalis Tx; (3) cone-beam computed tomography localization on a TrueBeam; and (4) cone-beam computed tomography localization on an Edge. Each ball bearing was positioned 5 times to the radiation isocenter with different initial setup error following the 4 image guidance procedures on the 3 Linacs, and the mean (µ) and one standard deviation (σ) of the residual error were compared.

Results: Averaged overall 3 ball bearing locations, the vector length of the residual setup error in mm (µ ± σ) was 0.6 ± 0.2, 1.0 ± 0.5, 0.2 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 on ExacTrac X-ray localization on a Novalis Tx, cone-beam computed tomography localization on the Novalis Tx, cone-beam computed tomography localization on a TrueBeam, and cone-beam computed tomography localization on an Edge, with their range in mm being 0.4 to 1.1, 0.4 to 1.9, 0.1 to 0.5, and 0.2 to 0.6, respectively. The congruence between imaging and radiation isocenters in mm was 0.6 ± 0.1, 0.7 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1, and 0.2 ± 0.1, for the 4 systems, respectively.

Conclusions: Targeting accuracy comparable to frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery can be achieved with image-guided intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment.

Citing Articles

Single isocenter HyperArc treatment of multiple intracranial metastases: Targeting accuracy.

Li F, Mail N, Stefania diMayorca M, McCaw T, Ozhasoglu C, Lalonde R J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 25(1):e14234.

PMID: 38059673 PMC: 10795440. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14234.


The new SRS/FSRT technique HyperArc for benign brain lesions: a dosimetric analysis.

Ho H, Yang C, Lin H, Chen H, Huang C, Wang S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21029.

PMID: 34702859 PMC: 8548509. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00381-9.


Dose escalation in the definite target volume.

Watkins W, Nourzadeh H, Siebers J Med Phys. 2020; 47(7):3174-3183.

PMID: 32267535 PMC: 8259326. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14164.


Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

Schmitt D, Blanck O, Gauer T, Fix M, Brunner T, Fleckenstein J Strahlenther Onkol. 2020; 196(5):421-443.

PMID: 32211939 PMC: 7182540. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01583-2.


Improvements in CBCT Image Quality Using a Novel Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: A Clinical Evaluation.

Gardner S, Mao W, Liu C, Aref I, Elshaikh M, Lee J Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019; 4(2):390-400.

PMID: 31011685 PMC: 6460237. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.12.003.