» Articles » PMID: 31011685

Improvements in CBCT Image Quality Using a Novel Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: A Clinical Evaluation

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Apr 24
PMID 31011685
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel iterative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstruction algorithm for prostate and head and neck (HN) cancer.

Methods And Materials: A total of 10 patients with HN and 10 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed. For each patient, raw CBCT acquisition data were used to reconstruct images with a currently available algorithm (FDK_CBCT) and novel iterative algorithm (Iterative_CBCT). Quantitative contouring variation analysis was performed using structures delineated by several radiation oncologists. For prostate, observers contoured the prostate, proximal 2 cm seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum. For HN, observers contoured the brain stem, spinal canal, right-left parotid glands, and right-left submandibular glands. Observer contours were combined to form a reference consensus contour using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation method. All observer contours then were compared with the reference contour to calculate the Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and mean contour distance (prostate contour only). Qualitative image quality analysis was performed using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (much superior image quality for Iterative_CBCT) to 5 (much inferior image quality for Iterative_CBCT).

Results: The Iterative_CBCT data sets resulted in a prostate contour Dice coefficient improvement of approximately 2.4% ( = .029). The average prostate contour Dice coefficient for the Iterative_CBCT data sets was improved for all patients, with improvements up to approximately 10% for 1 patient. The mean contour distance results indicate an approximate 15% reduction in mean contouring error for all prostate regions. For the parotid contours, Iterative_CBCT data sets resulted in a Hausdorff distance improvement of approximately 2 mm ( < .01) and an approximate 2% improvement in Dice coefficient ( = .03). The Iterative_CBCT data sets were scored as equivalent or of better image quality for 97.3% (prostate) and 90.0% (HN) of the patient data sets.

Conclusions: Observers noted an improvement in image uniformity, noise level, and overall image quality for Iterative_CBCT data sets. In addition, expert observers displayed an improved ability to consistently delineate soft tissue structures, such as the prostate and parotid glands. Thus, the novel iterative reconstruction algorithm analyzed in this study is capable of improving the visualization for prostate and HN cancer image guided radiation therapy.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Image Quality Evaluation and Motion Phantom Studies of an Ultra-Fast (6-Second) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging System on a Ring Gantry Linear Accelerator.

Zhao H, Nelson G, Sarkar V, Oare C, Szegedi M, James S Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 10(2):101681.

PMID: 39717196 PMC: 11665466. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101681.


Evaluation of a Vendor-Agnostic Deep Learning Model for Noise Reduction and Image Quality Improvement in Dental CBCT.

Kazimierczak W, Wajer R, Komisarek O, Dyszkiewicz-Konwinska M, Wajer A, Kazimierczak N Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518377 PMC: 11545169. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14212410.


Evaluation of a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm for Image Reconstruction on a Novel CBCT Platform.

Yashayaeva A, MacDonald R, Robar J, Cherpak A J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(11):e14516.

PMID: 39287608 PMC: 11539962. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14516.


Evaluation of knowledge-based planning models for male pelvic CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy on conventional linear accelerators.

Tegtmeier R, Clouser E, Laughlin B, Santos Toesca D, Flakus M, Bashir S J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(9):e14464.

PMID: 39031902 PMC: 11492302. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14464.


The Impact of AI on Metal Artifacts in CBCT Oral Cavity Imaging.

Wajer R, Wajer A, Kazimierczak N, Wilamowska J, Serafin Z Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38928694 PMC: 11203150. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121280.


References
1.
Purdie T, Bissonnette J, Franks K, Bezjak A, Payne D, Sie F . Cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image guidance of lung stereotactic radiotherapy: localization, verification, and intrafraction tumor position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68(1):243-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.022. View

2.
Sagara Y, Hara A, Pavlicek W, Silva A, Paden R, Wu Q . Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(3):713-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2989. View

3.
Nelms B, Tome W, Robinson G, Wheeler J . Variations in the contouring of organs at risk: test case from a patient with oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 82(1):368-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.019. View

4.
Kim J, Wen N, Jin J, Walls N, Kim S, Li H . Clinical commissioning and use of the Novalis Tx linear accelerator for SRS and SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012; 13(3):3729. PMC: 5716565. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i3.3729. View

5.
Sims R, Isambert A, Gregoire V, Bidault F, Fresco L, Sage J . A pre-clinical assessment of an atlas-based automatic segmentation tool for the head and neck. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 93(3):474-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.013. View